Other - Politics & Government - April 2007

The illuminati (decendants of alien/ human crossbreeding) are responcible for global warming. The attack on the twin towers was just a decoy, the real purpose was to disguise the release of super greenhouse gasses (developed at area 51) mixed in with the smoke cloud from the fire. Mind cantrol devices and clones were heavily used to help perpetrate this fraud. The purpose of heating up the planet is to allow colonization by the great elder race. Almost forgot this group is headquartered in Isreal and is responcible for the death of JFK (who was about to blow the whistle on them.

Please let me know if i forgot to add something to please any other group.

2007-04-10 09:48:29 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

for his disgraceful racial slurs. I wonder, would she have defended Rush if it were he that made the comment; or the McNabe comment? Or is she defending Imus' freedom of speech because he is a liebral?

2007-04-10 09:23:45 · 18 answers · asked by MaHaa 4

After all, we all know that he is the spokesman for the oppressed white christians in the world?

2007-04-10 09:20:00 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

is it some old group or one person or a couple of people a lineage something passed down in secret and where are they taking the rest of us

2007-04-10 09:11:30 · 9 answers · asked by rrm1c2a3 1

does someone who knows alot about politics see what i am seeing or am iblind to the reality of what is really going on i cant really type what is really going on what is really going on

2007-04-10 09:07:44 · 8 answers · asked by rrm1c2a3 1

Republican?

2007-04-10 09:02:00 · 17 answers · asked by ? 3

They believe that if we raise taxes and just go to work to pay higher taxes that the government will give everything to you, free healthcare, free welfare, free everything. We cant get the things we need on our own despite the fact that it has been working for over 230 years.

They think socialism is different from communism and that having the government nationalize everything and just paying to a centralized fund which si teh government and leave the wealth re-distribution to them.


Why do you want Hillary to be your new daddy?

2007-04-10 08:57:25 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

and that they are playing a stalling game for both sides to achieve a hidden agenda by ignoring the people, what should the American people do?

Is 4-8 years to long for a Presidential term during these crazy days? When you realize that an administration is failing, it is way too late. So you make a change by voting for the other party only to find that they are one and the same, again stuck with madness for another 4-8 years.

What I am trying to say is this: If you are trying to force change but are stuck with the same because of Lobbying and outside influence, how can change be made. The two parties are secretly milking our society and time for the same goals.

What would the American people have done in the early 1800's if they found that their whole political foundation in Washington had been taken over and manipulated at their expense?

If any of the people connected to the Founding Fathers were alive today, what would they think of our political enviroment in Washington today?

2007-04-10 08:28:55 · 11 answers · asked by scottanthonydavis 4

All the redneck racists on the web start whining. Its always the same:

>"What about free speech" Answer--Free speech means you can say what you like--it does not grant immunity from criticism. And no one is obliged to provide you with a microphone.
>"It was just a joke" Answer: Saying something that is clearly hateful and insulting--and designed to hurt others--is not a joke. That's the same excuse any schoolyard bully uses--and is just as fake here.
>"you're overreacting" Answer: Inus has done this repeatedly--promised to stop--and broken his word tod o so. He's used up his "second chances" and his credibility.

Inus should be fired. Bullies--racist or otherwise--should not be tolerated.

2007-04-10 08:23:42 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

It is obvious to even the most ignorant close-minded moron that this war is spiralling into utter chaos and all-out civil war with absolutely no chance for the US to "win" in any concievable way. The only solution is for the coalition forces, particularly the US, to leave immediately and let the Iraqis settle their differences on their own. The only reason there are insurgents is because of the invasion of their country by an aggressive and arrogant foreign power intent on stealing their oil and occupying them indefinitely. This was the plan from the beginning and Bush and his ilk were too short-sighted and ignorant to foresee the inevitable consequences of their actions.

2007-04-10 07:53:51 · 11 answers · asked by Jonathon M 2

2007-04-10 07:14:07 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

Other WORDS for "personal limitation"(s) ?

please only answer if you actually know the answer :)

2007-04-10 07:00:27 · 4 answers · asked by anabellavynsky 1

I hear this from my fellow Americans every day. But I never hear exactly why they think it so. On what do they base this statement? Have they lived in other countries or spent extensive time overseas for comparative purposes? Are there those who disagree? I don't want sarcastic or mindless answers, please.

2007-04-10 06:18:16 · 16 answers · asked by blueevent47 5

The leading scientists of the world were asked this question. Hundreds of them refused to answer because its not a complete question, but one from England did. He said yes, and then wrote into the survey that man's contribution to global warming was between 2 and 4 percent most likely 3% total. This was removed from the UN Survey - why?

By the way man's contribution to global warming was 10% in 1925.

2007-04-10 06:14:07 · 15 answers · asked by netjr 6

You have some basketball playing girls who can't be talked about in any light that they do not agree with. Good thing they're not representative of our CONSTITUTION where we are all granted FREEDOM OF SPEECH.

BUT, I think it's great that they get to offer their own version of free speech as they attack someone else's right to speak freely. Isn't America great?

2007-04-10 04:55:22 · 12 answers · asked by VOTE RON PAUL 2008 2

2007-04-10 04:34:38 · 24 answers · asked by manneke 3

I believe that Imus should suspened for a month. That way his ratings will be affected.
But don't miss the ball here. Let's call 50 cent and Tyra and others on their usage of the words.

2007-04-10 04:26:11 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

Okay so I moved recently. I filled out the change of address sort of later than I should have. Recently a couple of things came out return to sender now that a few companies have tried mailing me at my new address. What I don't get is, what does it matter anyway. Shouldn't I have received the mail anyway?

2007-04-10 04:17:51 · 5 answers · asked by acvader 2

2007-04-10 04:11:31 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous

I mean, I have even heard black leaders saying this lately. And what about that all black gated community in Atlanta? If I moved there would I be welcome, I doubt it.

2007-04-10 03:40:23 · 9 answers · asked by pedohunter1488 4

then how can the people in Congress claim to be making Progress???

2007-04-10 03:21:14 · 7 answers · asked by Fraggle 2

Does Israel put these evil people to death?
I think they should.
Why keep them in jail.
they are evil. and cannot be redeemed.
just kill 'em off.

2007-04-10 02:49:55 · 4 answers · asked by Who'sBetter 1

What about the cummulative effect of over one hundred fifty years of industrial pollution? Would you eat fish caught in the East River?

2007-04-10 02:43:11 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-04-10 02:04:17 · 15 answers · asked by MMC 2

What by law can i now do.
i know driving but is there anything else?

2007-04-10 01:58:31 · 20 answers · asked by Zalia 1

If he is a man of God , Why does he SEEK out people to hit with the RACE CARD?

2007-04-10 01:33:52 · 10 answers · asked by LIAR-KILLER 2

Shouldn't the Iraqi People be allowed to have a popular vote to decide if the US can continue to occupy the country of Iraq.
1. Do you think it would be a good idea?
2. Do you think it would show the US cares about democracy?
3. What do you think would be the long term ramifications?

2007-04-10 01:31:40 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

First off, I think his comments are obviously racist and disgusting. (I don't think that would come out of my mouth even if I were on air for hours a day, for years - I don't know where that came from!) But it seems to me that one reason it's especially hurtful is because of the target of the insults - young people who were not really "fair game" for public insults, but student athletes who were just trying to excel, and did.

If he had directed that comment at Maxine Waters or Condoleeza Rice, would the outcry have been less?

Politicians get flak, sometimes vicious and bigoted, all the time. Jack Cafferty just called Alberto Gonzales a "glorified waterboy" on the air, and most people don't even know about it. Maybe there's some double standard at work. But it just seems more cruel to direct it at a young person who is not really a public figure. (This may explain the "macaca" outrage too.)

Am I right? And if so, why do we accept more vicious slurs towards politicians?

2007-04-10 00:10:52 · 7 answers · asked by American citizen and taxpayer 7

If we're going to be consistent with the definition of terrorism, then isn't it about time that we acknowledge that what Israel does falls under the rubric of terrorism?

In British common law, the legal definition of unintentional murder is called mens rea. If a building was blown up without the intention of killing anyone but did so, the perpetrators would still be charged under murder. With Israel's persistence with these military acts in Lebanon last summer and the Palestinians territories, why isn't Israle labelled as terrorist. And why does the US and UK support Israel?

2007-04-09 23:45:10 · 26 answers · asked by Sai~ 3

2007-04-09 19:33:56 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous