English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What about the cummulative effect of over one hundred fifty years of industrial pollution? Would you eat fish caught in the East River?

2007-04-10 02:43:11 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

13 answers

Your observation, contrary to the general thoughts of far too many, is correct.
I am a conservative and as such believe in CONSERVING.
Conserving the environment is critical to our future.
Please note that I did NOT say PRESERVE.
Preservation is important in areas of special interest, but preservation eliminates CHANGE. Change is a fact of life and if there is NO change, nothing good can happen.
Responsibility rather than greed needs to be the direction and driving force behind progress.
Don't forget that the National parks system was started under Teddy Roosevelt, a famous Republican and conservationist.

2007-04-10 03:43:36 · answer #1 · answered by Philip H 7 · 2 0

The mere fact that there are fish in the East River means that your premise of "endless polluting" is false. The river is cleaner now than it has been for over 100 years.

2007-04-10 02:47:22 · answer #2 · answered by thegubmint 7 · 1 0

I find this to be kind of strange. With mans overpopulation of the earth, using resouces at a glutionous pace, and fossal fuels like there is no tommorow, I wonder how people can be in denial that we leave the earth dirtier then when we come into the world. I think it is a form of denial when people deny global warming exist, I agree to the extent that it is a cyclonic thing but how we can deny that it is enhanced by man is beyond me. .

Edit: finding mercury in fish in remote lakes in Michigan would seem to tell me that we are puting polution into the sky and it falls to earth in the form of rain. It is not just the east river that is poluted. It really is a world thing. .

2007-04-10 02:50:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Um..first you named a few people from no less than twenty years in the past. LOTS of modern-day musicians are not going the social gathering direction b/c both that is no longer their factor or they do not desire to emerge as choking on their possess vomit. Regardless the enterprise has a tendency to draw folks who make their cash from different individuals's vices. So anyone who has a small 'selection' will emerge as with a giant 'predicament' from being round individuals who can supply them what they crave. Second, there are PLENTY of acts that experience performed good with just a few vices. You possibly mindful of folks who have giant addictions b/c that stuff sells magazines greater than phrase that so & so is precisely vegetarian or is hooked on their Wii gaming console. Whining that 'is it no longer approximately the tune anymore?" indicates that you are no longer mindful that, duh! it's not! Musicians have had a culture of being ripped off by way of their possess tune corporation, and so forth. As a effect, musicians are fitting no longer simplest musical acts but in addition, in a few instances, their possess tune corporation, public family members corporation, and so forth. Deciding to be 'simply an artist' & go away the trade aspect to others approach you could emerge as but a different burn out who made thousands however certainly not noticed a penny b/c they signed the improper form of agreement. A rock chick is virtually the modern-day time period for a feminine who both is keen on rock tune or performs it. Its hilarious you are involved approximately all this then flip round & desire to understand a strategy to be a facet of it. :)

2016-09-05 09:05:54 · answer #4 · answered by gisriel 4 · 0 0

People forget that environmental laws have cleaned a lot of things up in the US to a tolerable level. For example, we no longer have fires on the surface of Lake Erie or Love Canal evacuations. Without these obvious and dramatic scenes supporters of the Republican agenda of unregulated capitalism can make these uninformed statements.

How_Would - that's a false choice and you know it. We don't have to STOP using manufactured goods to make the environment cleaner.

2007-04-10 02:49:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

People are selfish & stupid. Unless the situation comes to the boiling point they will go on polluting the earth caring little for the others and advising others to stop pollution till time will come so all will be affected and there will be no escape for ever.

So we all will die a slow horrible suffocating death.

2007-04-10 03:01:48 · answer #6 · answered by rajan l 6 · 1 1

agricultural pollution is far greater than industrial pollution, for terrible industrial pollution you should see the standards for china nad Russia (there are none)

2007-04-10 03:45:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Simply, its because unless the cumulative effect results in a problem at their door it doesn't exist.

That's why so many people are rejecting the idea of global warming. I can hear it now:

"Oh who cares, it ain't my problem."

2007-04-10 02:52:10 · answer #8 · answered by Awesome Bill 7 · 2 2

who are these people that think polluting is good?

2007-04-10 02:47:08 · answer #9 · answered by jim_2ooo 2 · 2 0

Perhaps you should stop using goods produced by industry?

2007-04-10 02:53:28 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers