English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Other - Politics & Government - March 2007

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

2007-03-25 15:05:08 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-25 15:02:34 · 2 answers · asked by wh00pass109 2

I see som Bigotry in this campaign against Gonzo

2007-03-25 14:56:23 · 7 answers · asked by Eleanova 3

I dont follow politics anymore but Gonzales keeps showing up in the Yahoo News headlines. Whats the story?

2007-03-25 14:45:32 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070325/pl_nm/toyota_bush_dc;_ylt=AgGwQDaxp3RF3GkL0B0buH2yFz4D

Could Bush possibly work harder to wreck the international community. Likely hes hiding how he plans to bail out the Big 3 which are a disaster because american manufacturing and automobile technology bites so badly.

2007-03-25 14:44:46 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

I recently moved from the UK to Japan and came across this for the first time...

You buy your bin-bags in packs, either large or small in size (volume). They're not that cheap- average about 3 UK pounds for a pack of 20- see-through, and have different coloured print on them, indicating what should be put in them.

Basically, the price of the bags pays for its collection and disposal. In short, if you throw out just one bag of rubbish a week you're not paying the same as someone who throws out fifteen bags a week.

The best bit is that the bags for recycleable items (separated into metals, glass, PET bottles, 'other' plastics) are markedly cheaper than those for burnable rubbish (food scraps, paper that you choose not to recycle, etc), so if you sort your rubbish into burnable and recyclable, you're both saving money / the planet and reducing the number of land-fill sites in your country.

How would you UK folk like this system back home? I for one think it's a great idea.

2007-03-25 14:39:13 · 7 answers · asked by Phil K 4

None of this is true of course, I was just wondering.
_______________________________________
I am going to build a platform the size of cuba in the pacific ocean. Can I build a platform in international waters, then declare it a free and independant state?

2007-03-25 14:16:36 · 3 answers · asked by Codster 4

I like the part about fighting terror and standing by our friends.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/usnw/20070325/pl_usnw/remarks_by_vice_president_cheney_to_the_republican_jewish_coalition_leadership;_ylt=Av214pFTJSReN7azGQUcS2myFz4D

2007-03-25 14:09:20 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-25 13:49:36 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

He says we need to negotiate to end the trouble over there and claims he would succeed where Bush and administration have failed. H---!! I say let him try. What have we got to lose.

2007-03-25 13:39:28 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-25 13:35:36 · 2 answers · asked by sxysavie12345 1

What is your opinion on the Australian Government's handling of the issue?

2007-03-25 13:27:37 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-25 13:10:10 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-25 13:08:21 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

I feel I should not be forced into watching people eat innocent animals like that in front of me at work?

2007-03-25 13:03:29 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-25 12:50:16 · 14 answers · asked by voodooelectric 3

The FBI abussed autority given the Executive Branch buy Congress via the Patiot Act. Memebers of the Executive branch were involved in determining who had access to the streets of new york. New York City Repubilcan mayor prevented, fefused, the right of assembly of disident groups. Both the FBI and New York Police spied on and infiltrated legitamite American religous, anti-war, anti-republican grass roots organizations to determine who would create head aches for the RNC in 2004 in New York City. Did the White House use (abuse) it's newly given authority for pure polical purposes to determine the identities of American Citizens convening o New York City in 2004 to express freedom of speech, and direct authotities to detain those Americans, and thus denigh them their Constituionally guarenteed freedom of speech? No evidense to date, March 25th, 2007, supports this accusation. No convincing evidense to date suggest this administration is above this.

2007-03-25 12:47:58 · 6 answers · asked by thornyisu 1

Can we preserve the dream? Impossible?

2007-03-25 12:29:09 · 12 answers · asked by justagirl33552 4

I have been looking at petitions for signing online and one person has asked for their petition to be signed for the following :

"Smoking whilst driving is very dangerous and many accidents and dangerous driving is caused by people smoking cigarettes at the wheel, which causes distraction and also inability to manage the car properly. Mainly due to ill steering around corners for fear of burning the car with the cigarette or only using one hand.

Smoking whilst driving should be banned and treated the same as using a mobile phone when driving."

Personally I say that (apart from my mobile phone - which I completely agree with not being allowed to use whilst driving) I can use and do what I like in the car that I pay my hard earned cash for - in the 16 years since I passed my test I have not had any accidents because I have been smoking

Whats your opinion????

2007-03-25 12:26:13 · 43 answers · asked by heckuvapeach 2

I heard it is slowly getting hotter just like earth. GASP! Are there really martians????

Excuse my sarcasm but why are these facts being omitted in global warming discussions?

2007-03-25 12:24:07 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-25 11:57:26 · 12 answers · asked by Barack O Bankrupt 4

fedest.com, questions and answers