English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

He says we need to negotiate to end the trouble over there and claims he would succeed where Bush and administration have failed. H---!! I say let him try. What have we got to lose.

2007-03-25 13:39:28 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

3 answers

I think it would be good just for the entertainment value. They would eat him alive in a matter of minutes.

2007-03-25 14:37:27 · answer #1 · answered by dizattolah 2 · 1 0

Well he technically would, the Bush administration has failed in the negotiation area all together. I believe they gave Saddam on option, give up his weapons (which wasn't an option because he didn't have any) or we would invade. That was quite a negotiation...so looks like Bush was just putting the mouse in an lose lose situation so either way he went the lion won.

2007-03-25 21:01:57 · answer #2 · answered by *unknownuser* 4 · 0 1

Imelda "Rice" has not done a god damn thing--this we know. She's a useless token (slang term) that no man in his right mind would bargain anything more than a sexual favor from.

But can you actually blame her for not making a "failed overall policy" practical considering the "out of touch" nature of it's authors?

Send in Kucinich--send in Ronald McDonald--send anyone in there to negotiate with a policy that reflects the position of the majority of Americans, anything other than what this current Corporate Fascist Multinationally Monarchy suggests will be the answer.

2007-03-25 20:51:36 · answer #3 · answered by scottyurb 5 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers