2007-03-25 11:57:26 · 12 answers · asked by Barack O Bankrupt 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Four Presidents have use Haliburton around the world to feed and repair during times of crisis. Haliburton is not the BAD corporation that LIBS talk about. There is no other company in the world that can do what they do. If we had waited for "BID CONTRACTS" our soldiers would have starved.
2007-03-25 12:02:43 · answer #1 · answered by LIL_TXN 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No.
1. Haliburton is not an American company.
2. There is nothing to be proud of about making a profit at our soldiers expense.
3. There is nothing to be proud of about being charged $100 for 1 load of laundry or a $1000 for a pizza.
2007-03-25 19:08:22 · answer #2 · answered by dharma_bum48326 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Haliburton got rich off the blood of American soldiers, and Iraqi causalities like some kind of corporate vampire feeding off the blood of our Country's best and brightest. What is there to be proud of, they moved to another country to avoid the reality of the damage their blood soaked corporate policy left here in America. Cheney should be forced to stand in direct sunlight, he would probably burst into flames like the vampire we know him to be. Bush is his "Renfield", a ugly, deformed little dupe. Haliburton is a criminal organization who moved off shore to escape having to account for all the money they have stolen from the American people that should have been spent on our troops, but somehow magically vanished.
2007-03-25 19:07:18 · answer #3 · answered by blogbaba 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Chaney owns Haliburton and wants unlimited funds sent to this company and to keep the war going is the only way he can do that and get as rich as he can before he is out of office. No restrictions on spending or investigations on spending.
2007-03-25 19:01:15 · answer #4 · answered by Ruth 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Firstly, 99% of companies don't do anything for America except employ Americans and pay corporate taxes - and then as little as they can get away with.
If I was a Halliburton employee or shareholder, then I could tell you whether I was a proud employee or shareholder, but I'm neither.
2007-03-25 19:35:05 · answer #5 · answered by lesroys 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes in spite of being demonized, by the gutless Liberals.
2007-03-25 19:08:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
How come when I hear the name I feel like I got screwed, without getting a kiss. In answer to your question. Not exactly. .
2007-03-25 19:03:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes. Now that they've sucked all that money from those no bid government contracts, they've moved so they don't have to pay taxes on it. It's a great business model.
2007-03-25 19:01:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Hell no.
oh and yes, what have they done for the United States?
2007-03-25 19:00:40 · answer #9 · answered by rare2findd 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
There is nothing to be proud of in their moving away.
2007-03-25 18:59:23 · answer #10 · answered by The Machine 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋