English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Other - Politics & Government - January 2007

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

To say that are you afraid that the government is going to impose more and more restrictions on your lifestyle ? In the name of national security ?

2007-01-06 17:34:16 · 14 answers · asked by caciansf 4

Why are you people so IN-tolarant of the Prez. ? You call him stupid yet he holds an MBA from Harvard- you call him a liar , yet the only so called lies you are getting is from the media where they tell you what you want to hear. And are not getting war info from THE PENTAGON. You make fun of his looks - which seems kind of just plain old foaming at the mouth - can't think of anything to say about the guy.
Take a look in the mirror ? - like what you see ? Are you ready to be discovered because of your super looks ?

Ya see it's like this - Ya'll are hipocrites
Ya ain't tolerant of anybody and it shows with your answers on this message board.

2007-01-06 17:28:30 · 9 answers · asked by caciansf 4

Try and name any kind of government power that in the end does not rest in the fact that the government can shoot you.

Taxes, Criminal Law, Building Standards, Zoning laws, Driving regulations ETC ETC The list could be endless

Resist any of these too far and eventually someone from the government will shoot you.

The question is should government and the politicians have a monopoly on the ability to use deadly force.

The Founding Fathers apparently didn't think so. They wrote the Second Amendment to the Constitution. They thought that the people should have the means, if necessary, to shoot politicians that got out of control.

If you agree say so.

If you don't agree then tell me how can you trust any politician or government with so much unchecked power. It doesn't matter which politician: Bush, Pelosi, Carter, Reagan, Whoever

Those that argue that more than just guns would be needed. The insurgents in Iraq are having success with guns & explosives.

2007-01-06 17:26:24 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

Because of all of the " Will work for food " signage which is basically translated: :Won't work for anything- waiting for a handout"

2007-01-06 17:18:42 · 8 answers · asked by caciansf 4

OK...for a long time it has been something of an urban myth....now a good majority of the people are acknowledging its existence, but when are we going to start to feel individually accountable for the creation and encouragement of global warming?

OR what do you do or can others do to take care of their own corner of the world and decrease this impending and likely debilitating problem?

2007-01-06 16:54:29 · 24 answers · asked by elysialaw 6

Your child go to Plantation in Laf, La. u should be very concerned about its health. The school board refused to test building for mold. There is a child who has been diagnosed with a very very toxic mold spore in his system, u ever hear the war term "yellow rain" it's a neurological damaging spore used in war in high doses to kill people. That is the spore this particular mold produces. The family has spent thousands trying to find out what was wrong with their child, meds are costing 1000 a month that ins. won't cover, but it's treatable. He only got sick at school, they tested their home which was clear, the only other place he went and the only place he got sick=plantation elem. They are suing and won't stop til the school is tested and cleaned, a child cld die. Headaches, vomiting, seizures, earaches and so forth. 1 teacher stated she has earaches during school & not in summer, why doesnt la. protect our children, y educate when u r killing them? Will hit media once suit is filed

2007-01-06 16:50:21 · 2 answers · asked by Steph 1

say he started from zero, no money for private school, working his way through college, no legacy exemptions, does he have what it takes, real answers only, unless you are really funny

2007-01-06 16:46:20 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-06 16:42:45 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-06 16:39:57 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

I can't take the credit for this idea I got it as an email. I thought it was a GREAT idea, what do you think??


Like a lot of people, I have a job. I work, they pay me, I pay my taxes and the government distributes my taxes as they see fit. In order for me to get that paycheck I am required to pass a urine test, which I have no problem with. What I do have a problem with is the distribution of my taxes to people who don’t have to pass a urine test.

Shouldn’t people have to pass a urine test to get a welfare check? I have to pass one to go earn it for them.

Please understand, I have nothing against helping people get back on their feet. I do, on the other hand, have a problem with helping someone sit on their butt. Could you imagine how much money the government would save if people had to pass a urine test to get a public assistance check?

2007-01-06 16:35:42 · 20 answers · asked by Meli 5

To many people vote based only on the fact of being republican and Democrat. I know it's nearly, if not, impossible to get rid of it, but, anyone else want everything independent? I mean based on opinion. Everythings screwed up.

2007-01-06 16:30:41 · 5 answers · asked by Andrew 1

They don't seem to care that much either way about Ethiopia interfering with Somalian affairs.

Where are the protests? Why hasn't anyone condemned them?

More importantly... how is it ANY different from the U.S. invading Iraq?


Do you just not care about Africa?

2007-01-06 16:17:55 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-06 16:10:37 · 5 answers · asked by pumagirl4life 1

If you say no, how can you be so sure? After all, the unwarranted wiretaping program is secret, ie, it is not examined by a judge.
If you say yes, do you have any evidence that Bush has done so?

2007-01-06 15:58:19 · 14 answers · asked by logan2012 1

Do people in this country care about privacy anymore?

2007-01-06 15:32:11 · 3 answers · asked by . 4

I do not think we can take much more of the same as it will break the country and it is very strained now.

2007-01-06 14:54:34 · 12 answers · asked by Gypsy Gal 6

couldn't we do it cheeper than the feds? What would be some of the lagistical challenges? and is anyone interested in trying this?

2007-01-06 14:51:33 · 6 answers · asked by magforce323 1

People post that their neighbors are living high on the hog, driving new cars, and eating out every night, and they're on welfare.

I'd like to know which state this is going on in.

2007-01-06 14:45:28 · 10 answers · asked by bettysdad 5

2007-01-06 14:39:05 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

It amazes me the weak ness of liberals! Polical correctness robs a parents rights and gives them to the teacher! The parent knows what is best for the child and because of this home school. is getting stronger! because of politcal correctness school shootings are ok ! Because of political correctness how many of our teenagers are dieing of aids! Polical correctness is killing america! and liberals dont have the guts to fight for america !

2007-01-06 14:27:58 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

I live in michigan. What other forms of identification do you need? How does it work?

2007-01-06 14:27:00 · 2 answers · asked by Tony K 1

2007-01-06 14:26:27 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

now thats a well run organization, don't ya think.

2007-01-06 14:23:09 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

What I am wondering about is if a President was to die, then the vice steps up right? Well say he/she dies who steps up then and so forth I need the next 2 in line if anyone knows -- please feel free to answer or tell me where I can find out. Thanks

2007-01-06 14:17:09 · 19 answers · asked by trouble25652 1

Should every American have access to affordable health care? Many countrys have it and they do not appear to be on the verge of collapse or anything, why would it not work here? Curently there are 45 million people without access to affordable health care. Is this no a shame in a country as rich as ours that we do not take care of these people ?

2007-01-06 14:00:10 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Mutually inclusive/exclusive? Can one operate in the absence of the other?

2007-01-06 13:31:18 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

then why did the unemployment rate go down every year that Bill Clinton was president to the lowest rate since 1969, can anyone give a legitimate answer


1993 6.91
1994 6.10
1995 5.59
1996 5.41
1997 4.94
1998 4.50
1999 4.22
2000 3.97

2007-01-06 13:14:20 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

they think our president and other officials have made the homeland very safe against attacks in domestic ways (i wonder what imaginary border security measures they are referring to) and then they say if we leave iraq we will not be safe even with the "homeland security" that our president has allegedly provided us all with.
So basically, they are contradicting themselves and also belittling our Intelligence's ability to intercept attacks. Double standards are on both sides of the spectrum, ok republicans?

2007-01-06 13:10:40 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

fedest.com, questions and answers