Other - Politics & Government - October 2006

what can stop you geting a pasport

2006-10-26 05:11:44 · 18 answers · asked by hypnotic474 1

You never had in history verifiable proof in results! All key positions are SEEDED candidates. They have absolutly NO respect for you just a selfish interest in lining their pockets with gold! Why do you continue to buy this ACT? Every elections you say you want change throw the BUMS out or incumbants & the majority retain their seats! How can you read this as legitimate?

2006-10-26 05:01:49 · 14 answers · asked by bulabate 5

2006-10-26 05:01:15 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Is there a Secret Agenda Behind this that these people only go to places in advance where America wants to go.Many other celebereties have done the same in the past.

2006-10-26 04:49:40 · 8 answers · asked by Dr.O 5

Amendment 14th

Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Section 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several states according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each state, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the executive and judicial officers of a state, or the members of the legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such state, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such state.
Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any state shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.
Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

2006-10-26 04:43:50 · 7 answers · asked by glitter2rainbowbrite@yahoo.com 1

I'm a Goldwater Liberal!

2006-10-26 04:39:00 · 6 answers · asked by wlday2002 2

http://www.rushlimbaughonline.com/articles/rush_limbaugh_viagra.htm
http://www.christian-aid.org.uk/world/where/lac/partners/0309modemu.htm

2006-10-26 04:28:08 · 22 answers · asked by wlday2002 2

from the very first day he took power he nearly started a war with china by flying awac's in chinese air space,only diplomacy solved the crises, then he attacked iraq, now he wants to stir up trouble in the korea, the north koreans are minding thier own bussiness, only bush who ordered thier over sea accounts to be frozen forced the north to conduct missile tests and recently nuke test.a man with an unstable mind in my opinion whouldn,t be in power

2006-10-26 04:26:18 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

Do you think he would have had any more luck finding Bin Laden, considering he would have had the same resources as are being used? Do you think he would have done anything at all? Do you believe Saddam Hussein would still be in power in Iraq? Would Gore have made him pay for his crimes against humanity, or done nothing? Clinton did nothing, so would Gore have followed suit?

2006-10-26 04:21:22 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-26 04:20:58 · 3 answers · asked by see 2

2006-10-26 04:11:33 · 7 answers · asked by curlyhurley 1

2006-10-26 04:10:40 · 25 answers · asked by mary 2

So if you did, what are your views on this Transgression...LMAO

2006-10-26 03:54:36 · 18 answers · asked by UNCLE FESTER 3

Do you think that the left's use of human sheilds like the Jersey Girls and MJ Fox to deflect criticism is a symptom that the general population can be counted on to use more emotion than logic when voting at the polls?

2006-10-26 03:53:46 · 8 answers · asked by Curt 4

I think it would really help some Americans understand why things like 9/11 occur if they only knew what their military and arms sellers were up to.

It seems odd that so many people got surprised by 9/11, yet most of the world knew that something like that was inevitable with the way that the U.S. military provokes violence.

Why should the American public have to suffer from things that their leaders and businessmen do?

2006-10-26 03:42:33 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

his logic seemed to be "if only we had stopped talking to North Korea years earlier, we wouldn't be in this fix!" It was laughable.

Meanwhile, why does no one blame Reagan for Iran? I mean the guy SOLD WEAPONS to the same Islamic fanatics in Tehran who held American diplomats for 444 days. Have we all forgotten Iran-Contra?

2006-10-26 03:35:54 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Uzebekastan, Tajikastan and in the Caspian region, I was told by locals that they laugh at the soft USA for caring for the rights of those trying to kill us....they claim that our outlook on torture of those trying to kill us and that those here who are obsessed with Human Rights makes us look very stupid

2006-10-26 03:35:49 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

I have a little money, and some credit card debts. I was offered a job, but to take it I would have to buy suits, ties, shirts, etc. I'd also have to buy a car, or at least a monthly commuter pass. This could be a lot of money - more than I have. I would have to spend what I saved, as well as borrow some on my credit cards.

Rather than doing that, shouldn't I just pay my credit cards and stay home? That way I wouldn't run up a deficit like the Republicans did.

YES, this belongs in Politics and Government. YES, I am being sarcastic. YES, I am trying, by a somewhat extreme example, to introduce the idea of INVESTMENT. People who receive tax cuts don't usually hide money under their mattresses. They either spend it or invest it.

What say you? DON'T BE NASTY!!! Try to answer substantively and I'll listen. Thanks.

2006-10-26 03:28:52 · 10 answers · asked by American citizen and taxpayer 7

What political party did he belong to?

2006-10-26 03:23:56 · 3 answers · asked by Joshua B 1

why racial discrimination is wrong?

I DO believe it's wrong, of course. I agree with Martin Luther King that it is contrary to God's law, as he stated in his Letter from a Birmingham Jail.

I also believe the phrase "under God' in the Pledge of Allegiance, as well as the concept in the Declaration of Independence that all people are equal and have rights given by a higher authority than any government, serve to protect people's rights. To be sure, people THINKING they know what God wants has caused much misery, but people thinking there is no one to answer to at all except for themselves seems a recipe for mischief as well.

So I wanted to throw my question out there, since many people preface their questions on social issues with "without bringing religion into it . . . " I suppose one could say morals are different from religion, but people often say don't bring morals into politics either.

Thanks.

2006-10-26 03:22:58 · 17 answers · asked by American citizen and taxpayer 7

long after the man is dead?

it's become soooo addictive for Republicans, it's harder to shake than an oxycontin addiction!

Will Republicans ever be able to kick the habit and enter a 12 step program that forces them to take responsibility for their economic, social and foreign policy disasters?

2006-10-26 03:19:00 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

I I need your opinion on this question. Is it true that donor Aid to Africa is just another way of manipulating and stealing from these poor people? For years this continent has remained poor yet it is rich with mineral and other natural resouces. Wars are rife with soldiers armed by the western world. what's your comment?

2006-10-26 03:17:33 · 12 answers · asked by henryjoes 1

Why do some states prioritize security over human rights? Could
the cases being studied reflect the debate between the importance
of human rights and security? In what ways did the reports of
Amnesty International reflect this debate? What are the major points
of both sides?

2006-10-26 03:09:26 · 3 answers · asked by iustus 1

Using the reports of Amnesty International, could the United
States be liable for criminal activities? Could the decision of the
US not to sign the treaty protecting her soldiers from criminal
prosecution for crimes committed be considered as strengthening of sovereignty?
In what ways could, if ever the US sign the treaty, threaten the
sovereignty of the US?

2006-10-26 03:07:51 · 8 answers · asked by iustus 1

If you are for the Ten Commandments should be displayed in courthouses and other public places, what are your thoughts on the death penalty?

2006-10-26 03:04:29 · 18 answers · asked by Salem 5

Do they support Afghanistan?

2006-10-26 02:51:39 · 15 answers · asked by Republican Mom 3

One is for corporte profit the other is an actually real war, can you guess which is which?

2006-10-26 02:42:30 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-26 02:30:48 · 11 answers · asked by Frank R 1

2006-10-26 02:29:50 · 10 answers · asked by Frank R 1

What number do I call for the State of Ohio, if I was employeed by an Ohio business and they are now refusing to pay me what they owe me.
Cannot find anything on the web and all the numbers I call for Ohio they don't know who I can talk to.

2006-10-26 02:26:15 · 5 answers · asked by caknox2002 1