Is there a Secret Agenda Behind this that these people only go to places in advance where America wants to go.Many other celebereties have done the same in the past.
2006-10-26 04:49:40 · 8 answers · asked by Dr.O 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
There are many many needy children here too at home.The charity must start at home.
2006-10-26 08:47:53 · update #1
Must be the new celebrity fashion accessory!
2006-10-26 04:58:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
The outrage over control, hunger and aids is at it's very worst in Africa right now. where a nationality/nation/tradition could be wiped out and quickly wiped out without immediate and continuing help.
Madonna said yesterday on Oprah's show that she has never met Angelina Jolie.
Although they are both hollywood actresses, they are different as night and day.
In 2001 (according to the internet) Angelina Jolie was appointed and given an honorary title by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) i.e. human rights "Goodwill Ambassador". UNCHR has programs around the world and Jolie represents them, so it's her job.She has also been a generous contributor to UNHCR’s programs around the world. I suspect one of her contributions is to show she is willing to open her arms to the world, so because she has the money and she can help in some situations, she expands her family by choosing by the child and not by the race.
Since several of the hollywood stars have now gotten involved with donations to third world countries and perhaps it's even a tax break for them, and maybe even assurance of further employment, maybe it's showing our nation's good will, or (looking at it from the other side) assurance of further donations, it also saves the wealthier females from downtime from their careers due to pregnancy and birth. They have the money, the child has the need...I can't see that we have are in a position to point out their personal motives whether it be Madonna's or any male star's motives. It's all helping people.
2006-10-26 05:29:53 · answer #2 · answered by sophieb 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't see a problem, anyone can adopt a child from any place they choose. Just because they want to adopted a child outside
the United State, doesn't necessarily have to be for publicity. It has to do with giving a child what is needed, like TLC. Their choice on going else where is to visit and help the poor. They have so much money that they are giving a helping hand.
2006-10-26 05:05:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Really? Where and when has this happened? Angelina may be sincere in her wishes to offer a better happier life to orphans of the African continent. Maddona is play acting and has just caused more pain for the family she claims to want to help. Selfish, self-agrandizing is Maddona's agenda.
2006-10-26 05:01:18 · answer #4 · answered by Answergirl 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It brings much needed publicity to people headed to the has been path
2006-10-26 04:52:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Angelina really believes in the things she does. Madonna only believes in herself and her self-promotion.
2006-10-26 05:01:52 · answer #6 · answered by Fred C. Dobbs 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
It's not politics. Just good old fashioned publicity.
2006-10-26 04:54:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
PUBLICITY......FREE...WORTH MILLIONS IN FREE PUBLICITY AND MILLIONS MORE IN ENDORSEMENTS/ADVERTISEMENTS AND SALES....
2006-10-26 05:12:31 · answer #8 · answered by cork 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋