(the creation and existence of their state.)
In both cases, people from other countries are immigrating to another. The difference is, Mexicans aren't asking us to return California to them. They just want to come over. But Israel actually took land. The UN and non-middle eastern countries supported it, but if we had to give up land to immigrants like Palestine did, we'd be pissed too, don't you think?
If we were gonig to have a stand, it seems that we should be for or opposed to both ideas, not one or the other.
FYI, I think illegal immigration is a problem, but I don't think it's a bigger problem than arab terrorists coming here on legal visas and going to flight school. I think crashing a plane into Wall Street would be more detrimental to our economy, security and morale than Mexicans coming over the border looking to feed their families.
Just my two cents. I like Jews, Mexicans, Palestinians and Americans, so it's nothing against a particular race of people. Thoughts?
2006-09-28
08:19:23
·
15 answers
·
asked by
snowraider
3