Immigration - September 2006

2006-09-01 04:38:00 · 10 answers · asked by dhongi 1

You non stop whine that illegals are ruining your economy and your country when the real culprit is that Nazi ******* Bush that you let steal the election.This piece of **** has single handedly put your country so far in debt that it will never come out and you idiots whine about illegals.You racist bastards are like sheep,wandering around aimlessly following the dumb **** in front of you.Get a life.

2006-09-01 04:22:31 · 19 answers · asked by theforce51 3

And this is coming from a Black, card carrying Democrat.

2006-09-01 04:17:23 · 20 answers · asked by TheGreatGatsby 2

EVERYTIME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2006-09-01 03:55:27 · 21 answers · asked by KD182 1

Will there be another march on Sept. 4th?

2006-09-01 03:47:07 · 22 answers · asked by Golosa 3

Everybody cut & paste!!!!

If you are Christian, you better start treating us better.

Catholic bishops call for humane treatment of immigrants
Kentucky’s Roman Catholic bishops have weighed in on the national debate over illegal immigration.
By Peter Smith
psmith@courier-journal.com
The Courier-Journal


By Peter Smith
psmith@courier-journal.com
The Courier-Journal



Kentucky’s Roman Catholic bishops have weighed in on the national debate over illegal immigration, calling for humane treatment of immigrants and policies that would allow them to gain legal status.

“We respect the right of nations to enforce their borders and to enforce reasonable immigration laws,” said the statement to be formally released Tuesday by the Catholic Conference of Kentucky, the lobbying arm of the state’s four bishops.

“At the same time, we regard every person, illegal immigrant, legal immigrant, or citizen, with the mind of Christ: a human person worthy of dignity and respect."

2006-09-01 03:43:09 · 18 answers · asked by Anti-illegals are out to get me 2

My wife and I are thinking of moving to the US from Canada. My wife has had a Green Card since she was a little kid (with no expiration date). We would like to eventually apply for a Social Security number for her and a Green Card for myself. We are both educated professionals with university degrees and substantial savings (not sure if that has any relevance... does it?).

Would we be better off applying from Canada of have her go down to the US and apply for me from there? The catch is that we don't really want to spend 3-6 months apart and I've heard that's about how long it would take for the application to be processed. I know that I could always go down there and not work until the application is approved but I don't really feel like spending so much time unemployed... any ideas?

2006-09-01 03:43:04 · 9 answers · asked by bucky 3

you let them in, u let them go , u protect them, u give them jobs ur doin this to your self not just hispanics all races they going to take over your country cause you like them here well the gov do not americans see u think only usa has this problem all the countrys do even mexico has this problem with to many south americans coming in there counrty then going to yours so its not just your problem quit feeling sorry for a country that loves illegals here economicly we doin ok but u say illegals taking all your housing,welfare,health care welfare you know hisapics arnt the only ones there lot of white people blacks who dont wont to get a job and just us your country wellfare they are a drain in your country yourself american u to lazy you wounder why we the lazyist country and fats in the world hispainc illegals work for what they want they keep this country going and they are a drain to your country no u americans get on the ball do smothing before its to late .

2006-09-01 03:40:16 · 13 answers · asked by vivadeftones 1

2006-09-01 03:35:08 · 22 answers · asked by Leif Ericson 1

A Moment of Science®
Section
Audio | Scripts | Books


You might have seen pictures of the American flag waving on the moon. Did that occur to you as being kind of odd? It might not have, but Don and Yael discuss why it's not even possible--and how they got it to "wave." Flag on Moon

D: Yael, I'm not a conspiracy theorist or anything, but I must admit that those photographs of the moon landing make me suspicious. I mean, the flag in those pictures of Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong is rippling in the wind, and everyone knows that there is no atmosphere on the moon. And no atmosphere means no breeze.

Y: Well, as you can imagine, the folks who came up with the idea of taking an American flag to the moon were aware that unless they rigged something up, the flag would just hang there. So they built a special flagpole expressly for the purpose of making the flag appear to fly.

D: So our tax dollars went to work reinventing the flag pole?

Y: Act

2006-09-01 02:58:53 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

Hi!
Some companies offers do it your self kits for immigration to Canada for about 400 Canadian dollars.
The kit contains the required forms and guidance and also some templates.
Does anyone know how can I download these type of kits from the Internet for free?
Regards.

2006-09-01 02:58:06 · 4 answers · asked by ILOVECANADA 1

Or for the lack of enforcing the laws set forth in the 1986 immigration act. He is not protecting the country and allowing an unprecedented invasion to go unchecked and has even allowed border patrol agents to be convicted for doing their job using Homeland Security resources to do it.

2006-09-01 02:57:38 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

or just fly them both on the same pole with the mexico flag on the top

dont we do this when we invade and concer other countries or posts in times of war

does this mean that we have been invaded and we are loseing

2006-09-01 02:54:35 · 34 answers · asked by mobile auto repair (mr fix it) 7

2006-09-01 02:54:04 · 19 answers · asked by concordconrad 1

ANCHOR

In U.S. television the chief news presenter(s) for network, local, cable and satellite news programming is known as the Anchor. The term distinguishes the presenter-journalist at the newsdesk in the television studio (or above the convention floor, etc.) from the reporter in the field. All news stories in a program are funneled through the anchor as he or she mediates between the public, the network or and other news reporters.

The most commonly cited source of the term is the television news coverage of the 1952 Republican presidential conventions; the metaphor is borrowed, not as one might expect, from the nautical realm, but from the strongest runner of a relay team, the anchorman, who runs the final leg of the race. In the conventional format of broadcast news, when the anchor is not personally delivering a story by directly addressing the viewing audience, or speaking over symbols and visual images of the news, he or she is introducing and calling upon reporters to deliver stories from the field or announcing a commercial break. Moreover, an anchor represents the public and its need to know whenever he or she interrogates and listens to the subject of an interview. National news anchors represent their respective networks and are held accountable for the ratings success of their respective news programs in attracting viewers. In keeping with this serious representational function, the anchor's style of delivery is reserved and his or her appearance is designed to convey credibility. In other words, the anchor is a television host at the top of a hierarchial chain of command with special reportorial credentials and responsibilities centered around "hard" or serious news of the day; celebrity interview and tabloid news shows have hosts, not anchors, even when they are organized similarly in format to network evening news. Journalists in other television news formats without a similar division of labor between studio and field are not anchors strictly speaking.

Being delegated with the daily, prestigious responsibility for presenting national news has brought public exposure that has made some network television news anchors into house-hold names. During his tenure as anchor of the CBS evening news, Walter Cronkite transcended the domain of broadcast news into becoming a widely-admired and "most trusted" national figure, eclipsing the fame of his cohorts, includingthe NBC newsteam Chet Huntley and David Brinkley; contemporary network anchors ABC's Peter Jennings, CBS's Dan Rather, and NBC's Tom Brokaw are national celebrities and highly-paid television stars. However, the role of the network anchor appears to be declining in cultural significance as the broadcast networks lose their dominance over the industry. The sheer numbers of anchors, for instance, the singles and pairs CNN rotates over its twenty-four hours of news programming, dilutes their potential star power.

2006-09-01 02:53:58 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

Can we trust this islamic new population?

2006-09-01 02:19:59 · 4 answers · asked by nsprdwmn 3

2006-09-01 01:23:06 · 11 answers · asked by mike 1

£3,000 if they will return home voluntarily
UK ANSWERS ONLY

2006-09-01 01:18:04 · 20 answers · asked by survivor 3

2006-09-01 01:11:48 · 21 answers · asked by mike 1

2006-09-01 00:55:41 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous

Past present and future of international migration for a study

2006-09-01 00:50:35 · 2 answers · asked by interogative old man 2

Just a thought ,..........considering the fact that at one point in time in our lives, our great great grand parents were all immigrants.
if this is the case , why then do people go on about immigrants...let him that is without an immigration history /Ancestry cast the first stone.

2006-09-01 00:44:35 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-01 00:31:03 · 7 answers · asked by Anitra C 1

if u dont´want illegal immigrants do not give them jobs!!!!

Who hire the illegal-immigrants????

If they wouldn´t find job they wouldn´t continue immigrating to ur country!!!!

2006-09-01 00:29:30 · 13 answers · asked by Cookies&Cats 5