You’re looking at a man that has Failed
to Stand Up for the U.S. Constitution.
He has Failed his Oath of Office.
The Oath of Office:
I do solemnly swear (or affirm)
that I will faithfully execute
the Office of President of the United States,
and will to the best of my Ability,
preserve, protect and defend
the Constitution of the United States.
In November Of 2005
Our President Was Heard Making This Statement
In The Oval Office Of The White House
“Stop throwing the Constitution in my face,
It’s just a goddamned piece of paper!”
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7779.shtml
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/december2005/091205pieceofpaper.htm
http://www.freemarketnews.com/WorldNews.asp?nid=3602
This denigration of the Constitution comes from a man
who twice swore on the Bible he claims to live by
that he would 'uphold and defend the Constitution'
For This Offense He Should Be At LEAST Impeached
If Not HUNG For Treason
2006-09-01 04:55:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
While I agree he should be impeached I don't believe his lack of policy on immigration should be the cause.None of the presidents since 1986 have done anything to strengthen our borders or adjust our immigrations practices..I blame them all along with the American people that couldn't see this as a problem before now.Its difficult to contain the cow after you leave the barn door open ..Close the borders ,create a moratorium on all immigration,legal or otherwise, until we can handle this escalating problem of illegal immigration.
2006-09-01 10:32:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by Yakuza 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I would love to see tighter borders .. but you do realize "Bush" is just a figure head and has no real power to in-act anything with out congress .. we have enough laws on the books already , they just need to be in-acted .. local law enforcement hands are tied ..its out of there hands ,because its out of their jurisdiction .. we the people need to rise up and call on congress to move their @ss or nothing will be done .. you have those that voted for it before they voted against it .. I have nothing against "LEGAL" immigration or any particular race .. I do hate law breaker's and those who side with them .. I think we should go after those in congress who are against "WE THE PEOPLE" , call them everyday and make sure you vote against them until we are heard .. we are getting no where blaming someone with no control ... the real power is in "CONGRESS"
2006-09-01 10:36:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
One. People don't understand what goes on in these countries. Women are raped,killed, and even get pregnant on the way to escape the horror over there. People from Haiti try to come over and the send them back and it is not great over there. So where can they go. So even though I can't stand Bush but I will back him up on this one. But yet Americans let terrorist come here and they become citizens of the U.S. and they run our planes into buildings. Also half the time wicked Americans bring women from other countries and have the work in a sex ring a men in Vegas and other parts of this country have sex with these women and even the children. So Half of the people over here didn't ask to come. And this is why people don't like Americans because they are wicked and they don't give a darn about anyone. You want people to learn English and yet you fail to learn theirs. That's why Americans have so many enemies. China has more oil than we do because they had since and learned the languages and showed that they had some sort of respect. So do some research before anyone speaks on this topic. And prove other countries that Americans are not stupid and wicked.
2006-09-01 10:20:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by catmenacestop 3
·
0⤊
3⤋
More of an insult and embarrassment to Bush is to have the people end up taking control. How would that look in the History books along with his other blunders?
2006-09-01 10:48:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by Made in America 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
He should be impeached but for many ADDITIONAL reasons than just the immigration policy.
2006-09-01 10:30:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by n600rr 1
·
2⤊
0⤋
There are reasons better than that, they are just suppressed. But we will probably have to carry on for the next two years. Besides do you think Chaney is any better?
2006-09-01 10:05:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by flip103158 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
To be impeached, a president has to do something very serious, like commit a felony.
2006-09-01 10:02:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jimmy P 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Hell to the yes. He sucks as a president.
2006-09-01 10:32:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by Trini 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes just add it to the list.
2006-09-01 10:15:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by Mojo Seeker Of Knowlege 7
·
1⤊
0⤋