Government - August 2007

Where in the constitution of the United States is it writen separation of the church and state

2007-08-21 12:49:23 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

i am thinking of becoming one

2007-08-21 12:27:38 · 25 answers · asked by V 4

considering the current unconstitutional situation, with the republicans failing to recuse themselves in the Bush v. Gore case, even with 2 of them having family involved in the bush campaign, ms. o'connor's admission that she didnt understand the florida law, and the general unconstitutional structure of everything republican against us, (WE THE PEOPLE), are not the only actual justices on the bench the 4 who dissent, and does that not make mr. breyer the actual chief? if you review what should have been United States v. Slavery 1989, then what was Marbury v. Madison, 1803, Plessy v. Ferguson !890, and University of California v. Bakke, 1978, don't we see a pattern of unconstituional decisions, undermining specific individual's 9th amendment rights? Did not each slave have the right to freedom? Did not Marbury have the right to work? Did not Mr. Plessy have the right to ride the train? Did not Mr. Bakke have the right to go to school instead of friends and family of power holders? 9th

2007-08-21 12:26:22 · 3 answers · asked by thomasdavidhalbrook@yahoo.com 2

Do most if not all Democrats assume that all Republicans are rich?

Are you stereotyping?

It seems as though it's either that or Republicans are some hillybilly, gun totin hunter who drives a Ford.




Not that I'm trying to taint answers, but I'm a Republican with a college degree in Criminal Justice and I'm not rich by any means. I perform a social job that most would not want to do by working in a maximum security penitentary in Texas.

2007-08-21 12:22:23 · 11 answers · asked by Glen B 6

In california, our two state senators are Boxer and Feinstein. I just wanna know what are their responsibilites and duties of representating our state?

2007-08-21 12:05:49 · 3 answers · asked by Gurrly_Knowledge 3

2007-08-21 11:52:52 · 6 answers · asked by Debbie L 1

I call it my 50/50 plan: on the first $50,000, you pay no tax. On anything over $50,000, you pay 50% tax to your state government. No other taxes will be collected by the governmment, and there are no deductions, and the government cannot raise taxes at any time for any reason, nor can it issue refunds or tax credits to any person or company or religious entity. The tax is based on your gross annual earnings from all sources, domestic or not, legal or illegal, active or passive. Your state government will then decide how much of that money to allocate for local, state, and federal funding. Any questions? See, it's so simple that you have no questions! Oh yes, and with it we have the balanced budget amendment for all states and the federal government.
Now, who wants to have a simple, fair, equal to all tax plan?

2007-08-21 11:41:57 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-08-21 10:58:29 · 8 answers · asked by Dave D 1

i cant find this info anywhere- can somebody give me a link that tells me when the first government was created, what country, and why? thanks, i really appreciate it!!!

2007-08-21 10:54:57 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-08-21 09:52:47 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-08-21 08:46:43 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-08-21 07:37:28 · 16 answers · asked by Tessie 2

We bought our house from my in-laws who have now lived in various parts of Louisiana for around 7 years now, (we are in Mississippi) and have not bothered to change their address. So, that means we get all his dad's credit card offers (and settlement offers, ugh) and his moms crazy stuff, and a lot of stuff they actually need in addition to the junk mail, and they expect us to mail it all down to them every few weeks. Its expensive and a real pain...

So, if I am able to convince them to FINALLY go register their new address with the post office, will they take care of getting the mail to them, or am I cursed with their junk mail forever (or until we move!)? Thanks!

2007-08-21 07:35:22 · 15 answers · asked by ASH 6

This way I will not have to search Yahoo Answers for them.

2007-08-21 06:17:24 · 3 answers · asked by BigWashSr 7

I often wonder what would happen if everyone on the earth belonged to one system of government, and we only had one standard currency system, one healthcare system, one communication system, and we did away with all borders and everyone on the planet could live where he or she chooses without worrying about immigration rules and regulations.

2007-08-21 05:50:47 · 10 answers · asked by Allen C 2

Go to church
forgiveness and non-judgmental, loving enemy etc
.
family values = marry and do not have sex outside marriage

support the troops = support killing terrorists and a few civilians by accident

support punishment like the death penalty as a deterrent

Deny abortions and do not help the single moms raise the child (social programs for poor)

Small government WHICH allows the corporations and wealthy to have power over us.

Why do repubs not want a government keeping the corporations and elite policed so that they do not abuse the people.
I agree that government can be corrupt but we CAN elect a new one unless they are in the pockets of the corps.

The greatest disagreement i have, is why do you not support a larger government that takes from the elite and helps the poor.

Isnt that christian? Should a person feel guilty driving 100k car and a 300k house when there are so many people in need?

2007-08-21 05:44:39 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-08-21 05:16:22 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-08-21 04:37:49 · 3 answers · asked by aelm 1

What do you think of hillary voting for the war then saying I made a mistake.
And now says the surge is working BUT we still must bring the troops home NOW.

Is that the same as saying the war is lost??
And do you think the big 3 media will call her on it?


http://www.nypost.com/seven/08212007/news/nationalnews/surge_working__but_too_late__h.htm

2007-08-21 02:45:49 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

One of the biggest factors in world issues today. Why is it that this is never addressed? Pollution, food, healthcare, infrastructure, education, poverty are all examples of problems that stem from a world that is over populated.

We have tons of laws telling people what they can and cannot do. How about a law that dictates how many children people can have, so the rest of us dont get screwed by having to pay for them.

Contaception is a wonderful thing that would solve many world problems.

What do you think?

2007-08-21 02:01:21 · 14 answers · asked by Paul 6

I have never really identified with any party, Im more of an independant, but it seems that Democrats tax and give everything away to everyone who needs something.

What ever happened to personal responsibility??

2007-08-21 00:59:29 · 18 answers · asked by Paul 6

2007-08-20 23:53:15 · 13 answers · asked by zaddi j (got suspended) 1

2007-08-20 23:46:06 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

hey guys i want some guidelines for my debate....
against or for the motion anything u want to say....
bt pls try to give as many points as u can...

2007-08-20 23:33:06 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-08-20 23:16:55 · 2 answers · asked by ningis n 1

2007-08-20 22:15:00 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-08-20 21:16:46 · 12 answers · asked by New Sage 2

Germans were friends of Hindus...

2007-08-20 17:54:10 · 2 answers · asked by Vibes 1

stealing irreplaceable resources to keep america from crumbling to its knees.

2007-08-20 17:43:36 · 15 answers · asked by geordie r 1

....do you think our Prime Minister is making a wise descision when considering sales to India...keeping in mind India has very bad relations with Pakistan...

2007-08-20 16:08:37 · 3 answers · asked by Ali 6