is mr. breyer the "legitimate" Chief Justice of the Supreme Court?

Question

considering the current unconstitutional situation, with the republicans failing to recuse themselves in the Bush v. Gore case, even with 2 of them having family involved in the bush campaign, ms. o'connor's admission that she didnt understand the florida law, and the general unconstitutional structure of everything republican against us, (WE THE PEOPLE), are not the only actual justices on the bench the 4 who dissent, and does that not make mr. breyer the actual chief? if you review what should have been United States v. Slavery 1989, then what was Marbury v. Madison, 1803, Plessy v. Ferguson !890, and University of California v. Bakke, 1978, don't we see a pattern of unconstituional decisions, undermining specific individual's 9th amendment rights? Did not each slave have the right to freedom? Did not Marbury have the right to work? Did not Mr. Plessy have the right to ride the train? Did not Mr. Bakke have the right to go to school instead of friends and family of power holders? 9th

Answer 1

Gore lost end of story, grow up and if you flag me you would be impeding on those constitutional rights you claim to respect, guess what the system is screwed up, it isn't Bush's fault, it is over 200 years old.

Answer 2

No
No
NO
No
No
No
NO

I'm probably missing a few of your "questions", but really, who cares?

From your Favorite Fishwrap, the NYT

On Nov. 12, 2001, The New York Times ran a front page article that began: "A comprehensive review of the uncounted Florida ballots from last year's presidential election reveals that George W. Bush would have won even if the United States Supreme Court had allowed the statewide manual recount of the votes that the Florida Supreme Court had ordered to go forward."

Another Times article that day by Richard L. Berke said that the "comprehensive review of the uncounted Florida ballots solidifies George W. Bush's legal claim on the White House because it concludes that he would have won under the ground rules prescribed by the Democrats."

On Nov. 18, 2001, Linda Greenhouse wrote in the Times that the media consortium's count of all the disputed Florida ballots — in which the Times participated — concluded "that George W. Bush would have won the 2000 presidential election even had the court not cut the final recount short."

Any more questions, Skippy

Answer 3

Have you established relations with Philipe Calderone and his "legitimate" Mexican government? Maybe you guys cans can knock back a few Cervesas and pretend that you actually won your elections and run your countries.