Government - January 2007

2007-01-11 10:58:36 · 19 answers · asked by Birdman 7

we dont know entirely now...but who would you want??? just an interesting question

2007-01-11 10:48:47 · 15 answers · asked by lori p 1

I'm not a bush fan at all!

2007-01-11 10:39:11 · 16 answers · asked by chrisorrrobinson 2

There are too few in Congress & the White House; hence power is dangerously concentrated.

If at least 60% of constituents in each district voted and obtained, say, an 80% majority, why not?

2007-01-11 10:33:36 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

I'm asking this because i'm concerned that future wars, more terrible than Iraq and Afganistan, will erupt over this resource that is disappearing faster and faster.

2007-01-11 10:22:08 · 7 answers · asked by anonymous 2

After a lot of creative google searching and Wikipedia reading, I can't seem to find the simple answer (i.e. - How and when, what session of congress it would be proposed; does the President need to sign it, does the Supreme Court need to sign off; Does congress need a majority or a 2/3 vote? Or a unanimous decision?)

Thanks!

2007-01-11 10:21:31 · 4 answers · asked by Andrew Z 1

2007-01-11 10:14:29 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-11 10:13:27 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-11 10:13:08 · 15 answers · asked by STOP CORRUPTION NOW 1

2007-01-11 10:01:55 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-11 09:49:21 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

more than three thousand American service men and women in Iraq, is going to send another 20, 000 to make sure it doesn't happen again?

2007-01-11 09:17:08 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

throughout history and even the Romans thought it was better to just brick them in?

2007-01-11 08:51:32 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-11 08:46:36 · 4 answers · asked by maivas229 5

2007-01-11 08:46:23 · 9 answers · asked by tuchby22 1

THE TOTAL NUMBERS OF COUNTRIES IN WORLD

2007-01-11 08:20:21 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

death of Americans is self perpetuating, and that guy, that wouldn't allow any of his training camps to be established in Iraq, Saddam Hussein, has been hung by the neck. With old George around why bother hijacking planes? 20,000 more troops to Iraq! Could there be a better time for Osama to order a kabab, mint tea, put his fluffly slippers, and just watch it all on Aljazeera?

2007-01-11 08:18:58 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

I had to do an essay question about the Great Compromise. It asked, among other things, what were the terms of the Great Compromise. I put about the two houses, Senate and House of Representatives, and pretty much everything else. However my teacher counted off 20 points for not talking about the three branches of government and seperation of powers. I argued that both the New Jersy Plan and the Virgina Plan agreed in these areas, thus not being part of the compromise. She told me that it was an offical documented compromise, in which the terms were clearly stated about the three branches and such. I didn't really doubt that until I started looking up on the internet about the Great Compromise and found nothing about either the Judical or Executive branches. I'm sure that I just missed it in my sources, but I would love to have clarification.

2007-01-11 08:13:41 · 1 answers · asked by Oracle 2

2007-01-11 08:02:16 · 5 answers · asked by mz.dad3_305 1

2007-01-11 07:51:03 · 3 answers · asked by karen! 1

2007-01-11 07:28:31 · 9 answers · asked by blacknight887 1

death of Americans is self perpetuating, and that guy, that wouldn't allow any of his training camps to be established in Iraq, Saddam Hussein, has been hung by the neck. With old George around why bother hijacking planes? 20,000 more troops to Iraq! Could there be a better time for Osama to order a kabab, mint tea, put his fluffly slippers, and just watch it all on Aljazeera?

2007-01-11 07:25:59 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-11 07:10:21 · 19 answers · asked by dude s 2

For instance, in a typical communist country would stock be owned by the people divided up equally (by law?) or would the government own everything and ration out to the people? Because in the first instance, everything would still be privately owned, just privately owned equally...in the second instance everything would be owned by the govenrment and distributed equally. (two different things)

2007-01-11 06:50:05 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

Just found out its being held in my home town, and I was wondering what it takes to go. Then I have to find out if I can go in my Class A's, but first things first.

2007-01-11 06:23:56 · 1 answers · asked by kittiesandsparklelythings 4

2007-01-11 06:11:03 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous

And Why? It seems like they have a a lot of the popular vote and yet can't translate that into an election win! Why is that? Answers please....

2007-01-11 05:48:29 · 11 answers · asked by Searching 2

Bush is trying to police countries with nuclear weapons. Why can America have weapons of mass destruction?

2007-01-11 05:37:33 · 5 answers · asked by kim_mii 2

2007-01-11 05:21:25 · 10 answers · asked by ADRIAN L 1

2007-01-11 05:15:31 · 7 answers · asked by Karasu 1