Do you believe there is more to 911 than we have been told?

Answer 1

Yes I sure did, that is why I made an effort to research the attacks on the WTC buildings and the Pentagon.

Most all the evidence that is available to us, show that the WTC buildings were rigged with explosives. Our own government had motive as was well as an opportunity to do this crime. Here is the evidence, presented for your scrutiny.

FAKE CONFESSION
The official government story is that the 9/11 attack was orchestrated by Al Qaeda, which is lead by Osama bin Laden. The proof our government provided was a video with Osama confessing to the crime. The problem with the video is that the person in the video does not look like Osama bin Laden: See picture.
http://911blimp.net/vid_fakeOsamaVideo.shtml
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pk519bkcLjg

EVIDENCE
There are many other factors that do not fit the official story. They include, secondary explosions that were seen, heard, reported, and recorded by firefighters, in and around the WTC buildings.
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-4574366633014832928&q=firefighter+bombs+in+the+building
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcRs1fv8i3I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHz9YWVgJWM

Here is a video clip showing a trail of explosions just before the destruction wave.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_DkzhonpGY&mode=related&search=

Molten, beyond red hot, "steel" was video recorded coming out of the South Tower just before it collapsed. Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to turn steel to liquid. Melted red hot steel was also found in "ground zero" of all three WTC buildings, including WTC7; the one no jet ever hit.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk&search=thermite
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3D2myMbQjQ

FORENSICS
A chemical analysis of the solidified molten iron,conducted by independent firms, yielded an explosive, called Thermite. Also found was a WTC core beam; most probably cut using the demolition cutting charge (Thermate). No core beams were left standing beyond a few feet high, for it to have been cut by an Iron Workers torch. Click on pic. to enlarge.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc_charges.html

CONFESSION
We also have a video recording, where owner Larry Silverstein, admits to demolishing WTC7.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7750532340306101329

MOTIVE
The New Conservatives (Neo-Cons), with the help of their friends, started planning the invasion of Iraq, shortly after Pres. Bush took office. Apparently, the plan would include the attack of the WTC buildings. It did this to get the support of congress and the nation, to attack Iraq. Read it from their own PENAC document. Pay special attention to the section entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force" page 50 and the top of page 51, where it states we need a new Pearl Harbor attack to get the ball rolling.
http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf

OPPORTUNITY
Witnesses saw a work crew going into the WTC buildings with rolls of wire, supposedly for internet upgrades. Tenants were moved around while crews "upgraded" the cable systems. The Port Authority cut power to the building for a whole weekend, just prior to the attack; shutting down the entire security systems. Witnesses also heard crews operating heavy hammering equipment that left a gray cement like dust, in the building. This activity took place just weeks before the 911 attack: The Port Authority had released control of the buildings to Larry Silverstein, six weeks prior to the attack: He made upwards of $5 billion off of the attack.
See "9/11 Mysteries" video: Time = 1:03:55 through 1:07:00 and 1:19:55 through 1:24:09
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003&q=911+mysteries&hl=en-CA

_________________________________________

There is also strong evidence to support a Douglas A-3 Skywarrior armed with a missile hit the Pentagon. One thing we can be certain about; it was not a Boeing 757, as our government claims. Listen to this retired General, He says, "The Plane does not fit the hole; so what did hit the Pentagon...?"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2VoUN-7RVU&eurl=

One might expect to see three holes in the pentagon, one for the main body and two more for each engine. The engine and engine parts were found outside of the building, they never penetrated the building thus no hole was created by them. The deep 18 foot hole was most probably made by an on board missile and not the aircraft itself. A radiation expert claims high-radiation readings near the Pentagon indicates depleted uranium (DU) munitions may have been used.
http://www.rense.com/general67/radfdf.htm

Witnesses say, the U.S. military secretly had Raytheon Co. refit an A-3 Skywarrior with new jet engines, a missile, and a Global Hawk guidance system, just prior to 9/11. Coincidentally, five key executives of Raytheon Co. went missing on 9/11. The official word is they died in the hijacked planes on 9/11.
http://tomflocco.com/fs/WitnessesLink.htm

The Jet engine(s) found may be key to identifying what type of aircraft hit the Pentagon: At the very least, they help determine a Boeing 757 did not hit the Pentagon. Both the jet engine housing as well as a "front end rotor head" have been identified as belonging to a Pratt & Whitney JT8D jet engine. The P&W JT8D engine has been used on the smaller Boeing 727 as well as a retrofit for the A-3 Skywarior. Two P&W JT8D's do not provide enough thrust to get a Boeing 757 off the ground much less sufficient power to perform the military precision maneuvers the aircraft in question did.
http://www.rense.com/general63/ident.htm
http://www.karlschwarz.com/02-02-05_Schwarz.pdf

A photograph of a cracked windshield found at the crash site strongly resembles the top canopy glass found on the Skywarrior: No windows of this shape are found on a Boeing 757.
http://home.att.net/~carlson.jon/911Pentagon.htm

The landing gear is one part found in the crash site that may be linked to a Boeing 757. It could also be a part that was retrofitted on an A-3 Skywarrior, since the wheels would most likely need to be replaced with something still available.
http://www.pentagonresearch.com/084.html

A geometric analysis can show the aircraft that hit the Pentagon is under 85 feet long and therefore too small to be a Boeing 757, which is over 155 feet long. An A-3 Skywarrior is 76 feet 4 inches long. See geometric analysis: also see revision note under comments.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Avt4N5qfsIKkwbXeL7iLXmPsy6IX?qid=20061122203115AAj8XR6

Answer 2

First of all thumbs up for you!
September 11? An illusion at daylight?
I was watching a program about 9/11 event moments ago and it said things that suprised me.I will summarise it for you:
There was a video which was recorded by an American just at the time of the event.This video was not shown in the U.S because it contained evidences which proves that 9/11 event was nothing but a hoax.Most likely it was a dirty terrorist operation organized by the U.S govenment itself to charge a group of innocent people.To attack them.To remove Saddam who did not obey the U.S anymore.To attack countries like Afghanistan and Iraq and steal their energy sources.To do terrible things in the name of fighting terrorism.What are the evidences?here:
Slow motion shows that just before the plane hit the tower there was a light at the collision point INSIDE the tower itself (just before collision).And there was smoke comming up from the BOTTOM of the tower which obviously was not the effect of plane colliding the TOP of the tower.So it could have been a bomb at the bottom of the tower.(this video is a secret one which was sensored in the U.S news).An American standing near the tower has clearly seen that the plane DID NOT have any windows so it COULD NOT have been a passenger plane stolen by immagenary terrorists.Fire fighters who enterd the tower heard the sound of ORGANISED explosions.They were quite sure that there were bombs in there which were planted from before.Have you noticed that tower floors were collapsing in an strange order?One by one?Very neat and clean(organised) work?Ain't it?And slow motion shows that there was a big (missle shaped) object attached to the BOTTOM of the plane.A really complicated job which OBVIOUSLY under-developed countries or stupid Ben Ladden could not have done.Destroying a gigantic building and turning it to dust needs quite a lot of work (at least two months).It needs Complicated calculations done by it's own designers.To calculate which point is suitable to be hit and loads of other things which OBVIOUSLY ....(you know the rest!)
It is time for the U.S people to wake up and see the truth and to get rid of their so called GOVERNMENT.Maybe if I were an American I would be decieved too.But they can see what terrible things their government is doing in the world.So why don't they stop it?Please DO NOT throw stons at me.I like Americans but along with millions of others I hate their government.I am sure there are lots of intelligent people in the U.S who actually know who is guilty.My lip service is:Up with Americans.Down with Bush.

Best answers: Best Answer - Chosen By You

Sounds to me like the movie you were watching is called "9/11: In Plane View" This movie does show mucch evidence that hasnt been explained away. And, to clear the confusion others are having - it is not that this video cannot be seen - it can be seen in this movie! It is that, when the producers went to the ABC and NBC in order to get copies of that footage, they were told they could not have copies of that particular footage. They obtained the footage from the many people around the country who turned on their VCRs and started to record that day - and much of the reports made on that day have disappeared from vaults at ABC and NBC....this was footage of people in the streets screaming "Those are NOT american airlines!" and "Those are not passaenger planes!" Also seen and heard are firemen running from the scene screaming "That was a controlled demolition! I heard the floors falling one by one!"


It is a fact - building 7 was "pulled" less than 5 hours after the WTC towers fell. "Pulling" is a demolition term for destroying a building so that it crumbles in on itself. Planning for a project like this takes approximately 1 month of reading plans, setting explosives in strategic areas, etc. The US Govt has it completed within 5 hours......

If there wasnt a conspiracy, I dont know what one is.... And if today isnt a day to question it, when is? No one has questioned this for five years!

Answer 3

I did 911 heres the real story
I flew out of a frozen over hell on m pig on the way to the pie in the sky
I stopped by and did 911
Yes the stupidest president ever planned 911 and flew one of the planes also
Fing-retard

Answer 4

As far as what really matters or are you talking about the works of fiction in the consparcy people who think Bush did 9/11?

Maybe you should ask Sandy Burger who left the National Archives with classified information.

Answer 5

Of course.
Some people believe the US government planned 9/11. I disagree... but I do agree on a few things.

1. They didn't plan it but they let it happen. Too many mistakes, too much information ignored. Germany, the U.K, Canada and seven other countries warned the US about 9/11.

2. You can see it in the Wolfowitz Doctrine. ““The process of transformation, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event—like a new Pearl Harbor.”— Paul Wolfowitz, 1992.

"The group’s essential demand was for hefty increases in defense spending. “We need to increase defense spending significantly if we are to carry out our global responsibilities today and modernize our armed forces for the future,” the statement’s first principle reads.

The increase in defense spending is to bring about two of the other principles: “to challenge regimes hostile to our interests and values” and “to accept responsibility for America’s unique role in preserving and extending an international order friendly to our security, our prosperity, and our principles.”

A subsequent PNAC plan entitled “Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategies, Forces and Resources for a New Century,” reveals that the current members of Bush’s cabinet had already planned, before the 2000 presidential election, to take military control of the Gulf region whether Saddam Hussein is in power or not."

Believe what you want. I am only providing evidence that backs up my opinion of what transpired on September 11, 2001.

Answer 6

I believe there is less to 9/11 than we have been told.

I don't believe Iraq was involved though we were told they were.

I don't believe we made an earnest attempt to capture Osama in Afghanistan though we were told we did.

I don't believe the world changed on 9/11. I think America changed on 9/11 and the world has change their feelings about
America because of the way we changed.

I don't believe Islamic Terrorists hate us for our freedom though we were told they do.

Answer 7

Yes Eric Cartman was right it was Kyile..It was Kylie...No man just a bunch of pissed off Muslims that caught us sleeping....We didn't take them serious till 9/11....

Answer 8

Yes, but only because Osama has not been interrogated yet. Do I believe those wacky conspiracy theories that the US government had some part in it? Not for one moment! I'm too intelligent for that!

Answer 9

Yes there's all sorts of stuff that i've heard about 911 that scares me; the actor who brought out a book about it was a few months later 'found' to have been beating his wife

Answer 10

here we go again.................YES, there is much more than you can imagine......and not only with 9/11. You don`t want to even know about other things because it will take you very long time to beleive it if you still have doubts about 9/11 when they leted die they own people...............