English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Government - January 2007

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Government

2007-01-29 03:45:04 · 2 answers · asked by funny 1

I dont.
people say it will help find terrorists and criminals carrying weapons, true, but its going a bit far for me!
would we have 1 on every street corner or just the most probable places?.........Mmmm.

2007-01-29 03:16:44 · 6 answers · asked by nottinghamninja 2

All membership dues will be TAX DEDUCTIBLE. This would be your annual dues for membership in a citizens group that does the following:

1. Sends out a comprehensive questionairre to candidates for public office and elected officials at the local, state and federal levels throughout the United States and allows those same candidates and elected officials to answer the questions in their own words defining their exact position on a comprehensive variety of questions instead of merely yes or no.
3. Gathers those responses and posts them on a single website. The details of that data would be viewable, in full, by members only. But also publishes responses, in a summary form, for the general public and media.
4. Allows members to complete the questionairre anonymously (although they can choose to make their responses public) and to add questions to the questionairre that is presented to candidates and elected officials. A summary of responses will be available to public/media/etc

2007-01-29 03:02:18 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

There are so many people int he US that think that our country becoming a police state is a good thing since they believe that it will make us safer.

How much personal freedom are you willing to give up in the name of safety?

2007-01-29 02:41:49 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-29 02:01:13 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-29 01:59:02 · 11 answers · asked by aliciah923 1

2007-01-29 01:58:32 · 3 answers · asked by aliciah923 1

We have the technology to finally directly represent ourselves within our government. Why can't we make party politics illegal, and directly represent ourselves in the lawmaking process?

If it's possible to vote via your cellphone on some stupid gameshow...why not make it more practical?

It doesn't matter whether you're a liberal or conservative, republican or democrat...everyone that participates has a voice and majority would rule. Then I wouldn't have to choose the lesser of two evils in the voting booth election year after election year.

2007-01-29 01:40:14 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

on the news usa just did that and all hell is coming upon us all,

2007-01-29 01:36:21 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Do you think it is nomal?
You probably will if you are part of the whealthy.
I have nothing to complain about but I can see what poeple with lower income have to struggle. When on the other hand they are fortunes made that are despicable.The richget richer by squeezing the little ! It 's a fact.

2007-01-29 01:31:53 · 14 answers · asked by heretoday 1

2007-01-29 01:02:38 · 5 answers · asked by Balraje 1

poverty is the one of the most disease condition in india.

2007-01-29 00:33:40 · 17 answers · asked by jithin j 1

2007-01-29 00:16:12 · 3 answers · asked by Sophie G 1

Surley this is wrong, 4 months for recording phone calls about the royals........
versus....
a peadophile NOT going to prison because John Reid tells the judicial system not to send offenders to prison unless really needed.
they got it the wrong way round, that peado is free on the streets to re offend!.....stupid, stupid, stupid!

2007-01-28 23:23:04 · 3 answers · asked by nottinghamninja 2

Please dont bother with jokes about buying them or by giving loads of dosh to the labour party, I need a serious answer, I'ts for a book I'm writing.

Who choses who becomes a peer? Is it the PM? or a member of the royal family? or a collection of people / committee?

Thanks

2007-01-28 22:52:36 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

any servey done on the related topic

2007-01-28 22:44:50 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous

I am just curious as to how many people in yahoo answers believes that George W. Bush and the government actually cares about the well being of Americas citizens instead of their continual greediness to get richer? I ask you to give me serious answers and please be honest!

2007-01-28 21:05:41 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

60 years of independence!!!!!!!!!
Have we developed the way we expected to?
why is it that mostly our democracy chooses the wrong leaders?Is it because every party is the same anyway?When will sincere&deserving people choose to take the responsibility?
Why has the problem of our country developing become greater than at the time of independence?
Why are so ridiculously most of our politicians old&even more most of them corrupt?

2007-01-28 20:38:47 · 2 answers · asked by cricketlover 1

In the 60's America is No. 1 in all aspets (military power, economic power, technologies etc.), how about now can Americans really proclaim that they are still No. 1?

2007-01-28 20:23:59 · 11 answers · asked by yolanda o 2

i m a housewife and i want to do job in indian railway for a leval for graduate (b.a.) plz give me a good answer

2007-01-28 18:50:30 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-28 18:14:31 · 6 answers · asked by Ron T 1

2007-01-28 18:10:58 · 9 answers · asked by Ron T 1

Many speakers lately are very concerned re: US turning into a Fascist-like country. Suddenly this orgBlackwater showed up on streets of Katrina armed, they are non-gov professionals for hire to help in out-of-order situations.

2007-01-28 18:02:31 · 7 answers · asked by spareo1 4

they always kill.. kill to protect their country by invading other country and manipulate the cause of their attack.. US is synonim to the world as a WAR monger.

when they attack Vietnam for justice i support them even i'm still in school then.. unfortunately they lost to a down grade country in that war.. why? is it because to serve and protect?

BUT when they attack Iraq.. it seems like they're attacking to grab the land like Israel attack Palestine. They attack full power, spending lots of tax money efficiently. They're so pumped up to grab the land. This proves when they invite contractors and US investors to country.. well thats before Nick Berg got beheaded.

war on Iraq is a long term invest for US to conquer middle east?..
conquer it for all i care.

since when killing has become a business to US?
since Bush? or his father? or his mentor?

all i see is the world economy plunging down and the US economy dropping slowly until they're the top of the chart.

2007-01-28 17:56:16 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

Either person or nation. All comments and opinions welcome.

2007-01-28 17:08:37 · 14 answers · asked by *** The Earth has Hadenough*** 7

is it right that the political ommand has to be take under hands of the young generation young generation has to be come in the field of politics to make our country develop fastly

2007-01-28 17:02:36 · 7 answers · asked by sandeep s 1

This is a graph of the yearly US Budget Deficit or Surplus by Presidents. Notice the big net loss during President George W. Bush term.

http://salaswildthoughts.blogspot.com/2007/01/yearly-us-budget-deficit-or-surplus_29.html

2007-01-28 16:58:05 · 5 answers · asked by eals74 2

fedest.com, questions and answers