Elections - December 2007

Can you name 5 GOOD reasons to vote for Hilliary Clinton?

2007-12-28 03:29:48 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

Add 1 more to the list to get best answer.

10. Salem witch trials to reunite in DC

9. Over 8 year presidential extension so Hillary can actually complete her plans (See Chavez referendum)

8. It will be Presidents Day every day and we will be praying for the return of Civil Rights Day.

7. Canada will need to invent strict immigration laws since US citizens will be fleeing in like a hurricane.

6. The entire US population will be less than Puerto Rico by 2087 due to all the baby killing.

5. The wall Bush wanted around Mexico will be complete when
the US is surrounded by a wall due to Hillary's communist beliefs.

4. Men will have less rights than slaves.

3. The Communist party will be concidered right-winged.

2. Bush will be put on trial to be punished for his crimes and Hillary will continue to keep us in Iraq for the rest of our lives.

1. Bill Clinton will do the same exact thing as Vice President as he did as President!

2007-12-28 03:15:31 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

It appears more media and candidates are paying MORE attention to the South Carolina primary of Jan 26 than the EARLIER Nevada primary of Jan 19. Nevada has more delegates than New Hampshire.

2007-12-28 02:54:54 · 5 answers · asked by ? 2

I really don't understand why this man is your president? In the UK most politicians have studied politics and have a fairly good education to start with, but this buffoon [1] I see regularly making a fool of himself while representing the people of America seems never to have clue about anything he is talking about. What are the basic job requirements to be the president of the USA or are they just "talking heads" for other decision makers behind the scenes?

[1] 1. a person who amuses others by tricks, jokes, odd gestures and postures, etc.

PS: I do not claim UK politicians are perfect but they do seem to have at least studied most subjects before commenting on them in public ;-)

2007-12-28 02:16:31 · 39 answers · asked by Your Own Personal Jesus 3

2007-12-28 01:25:13 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-28 01:20:10 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-28 01:15:01 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

Make Florida vote again in a special election is the only thing I can think that would have been fair.

And don't say declare Gore the winner. Millions of people would be just as outradged that it wasn't Bush

2007-12-28 00:34:15 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

If Hitlary-care goes through that's what will be expected of doctors.

2007-12-28 00:28:59 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

everytime we face elections in the country one has to undergo so many problems. is there any way to curb these unwanted traumas?

2007-12-27 21:27:05 · 3 answers · asked by jaganj 1

I love his ideas, but do you think his dreams are too big to be fulfilled while in office? I mean, he seems sincere about them, but will the government go along with his revolutionary plan for the American people??

2007-12-27 20:15:33 · 20 answers · asked by Derek D 2

"We democrats are going to address this issue after the election when we take control of the congress. We will return to the 60% to 80% tax rates on the rich and we will be able to take at least 30% of all current lower Federal Income Tax tax payers off the roles and increase government income substantially. We need to work toward the goal of equalizing income in our country and at the same time limiting the amount the rich can invest."

When asked how these new tax dollars would be spent, she replied:

"We need to raise the standard of living of our poor, unemployed and minorities. For example, we have an estimated 12 million illegal immigrants in our country who need our help along with millions of unemployed minorities. Stock market windfall profits taxes could go a long ways to guarantee these people the standard of living they would like to have as "Americans".
This is what we have to look forward to if we elect a DEMOCRAT. What do you think?

2007-12-27 19:12:15 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-27 17:44:04 · 5 answers · asked by TedEx 7

2007-12-27 15:07:43 · 13 answers · asked by only1nor 1

2007-12-27 14:56:35 · 12 answers · asked by 13mexican 2

There are plenty of white supremacists and neo-Nazis who support Mr. Paul's campaign.

Is this just a coincidence? Or should we further analyze his previous statements:

"I think we can safely assume that 95% of the black males in that city (Washington DC) are semi-criminal or entirely criminal."

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/5/15/124912/740

2007-12-27 14:51:39 · 17 answers · asked by buzzfeedbrenny 5

I think we got the wrong idea targeting the Muslim people as anti-christ. Concerning the mark of the beast, do you really think he (the anti-christ) will go door to door like a salesman. No he will have agents of evil, regardless if he is not here yet we need to be focusing on how to resist the mark and prepare in that defense rather than being at war with each other. Is the antichrist just going after Hindus, Muslims, Catholics, Orthodox, Buddhists or will he just pick and choose? Refer to the verse in the Bible it said "that no man shall buyeth or sell without the mark of the beast." It is more of a personal temptation and spiritual battle than trying to fight other countries. I am nobody but I also beleive this hasnt happened yet, the anti christ. The very fact of someone trying to forcce a chip in someone else without their consent is a direct violation of the third amendment "No quartering of soldiers in private houses."

2007-12-27 14:45:09 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

As earlier today, Bhutto was assassinated, General Musharaaf now has no real opposition and therefore will win the demanded election in Pakistan. Since Bhutto had very good odds of winnning, and now those votes will not be cast on her succeeder, will pakistan be voting back the General? Can the U.N. impose economic sanctions on Pakistan because of this act of terrorrism?

2007-12-27 14:15:54 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Between Hilary Clinton and Mike Huckabee.

I think that Hilary is wanting to be president for the money, cause, Bill was president from before. And she ran for office in New York. So I think that she is going for office just for the money.
And Hilary Clinton also doesn't care about us Arkansans anyway.
I think that Mike Huckabee would be a better president.

So who would you like for president?

2007-12-27 13:53:06 · 27 answers · asked by AARON BLACK 4

2007-12-27 13:50:22 · 7 answers · asked by brandon r 3

I only see the shadow of Big Brother towering above UK and USA -- EU. Bhutto might inspire some voters to demand better. I am certain that I want something better.

Corp CEOs and faceless bureaucrats are not a good substitute.

2007-12-27 13:25:55 · 18 answers · asked by JIM 4

2007-12-27 13:02:12 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=zT-ouQPgMmI
For a peak of his dictatorial skills, you can watch him at this townhall meeting. He takes the mic away from city workers then calls them morons.
Around 1:02

2007-12-27 13:00:32 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

As senator, governor, mayor, etc.

2007-12-27 12:56:38 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-27 12:36:50 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

The way I understand this, it doesn't matter if everyone in the entire state votes for a partcular candidate, the ONLY votes that count are the ones from the electoral college, and these votes do NOT have to match the votes of the masses. So, I ask---what's the purpose?

2007-12-27 12:12:57 · 16 answers · asked by sharon w 5

Does anyone know if Ron Paul has an official stance on NASA and if so, what is it?

I am guessing that he would completely deregulate the "space industry" while dramatically cutting funding for NASA, resulting in a short-term drop in American abilities to explore space, but a long term jump as the industry is privatized and the efficiency of the private sector takes over.

Any ideas?

2007-12-27 11:47:06 · 16 answers · asked by mannzaformulaone 3

2007-12-27 11:44:36 · 16 answers · asked by Violet 2

These democratic candidates like Obama and Hillary talk about sitting across the table from our enemies. While I would piss myself, if were either of these two.

Who do you want sticking their finger in the face of Kim Jong-IL or Ahmedinajad or god forbid a new Pakistani president that is pro-Taliban and has a nuke?

No flip answers or Bush bashing. Let's have some serious debate here.

2007-12-27 11:15:59 · 13 answers · asked by wcowell2000 6

2007-12-27 11:13:52 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous