Ron Paul advocates smaller federal government. Great!
And Ron Paul's policies will reduce the federal tax burden on American families. Great!
Yet Ron Paul's policies are usually to give the State more control. Such as Education.
Now obviously if the state is left to provide the resources for Education then local taxes will go up. Which may not be a big deal for heavily populated areas or states because the amount they are taxed may simply make up for the fewer taxes they are paying federally.
YET, in smaller population states/areas either the tax burden will be much greater or the quality of education will be at a different level.
Music, Technology, Libraries, Vocational Programs, will all be vastly cut in order to keep taxes reasonable for the less popluated states/areas.
So back to my question, based on this, doesn't Ron Paul's policies actually translate to more taxes?
2007-12-08
14:07:30
·
5 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous