are from a long time ago, so why bring it uup now. Als someone had a question about if he would be swore in on the morman bible, the Muslim legislator was swore in on a koran and no one had a fit, did they? Just wondering Thanks.
2007-12-08 13:55:17 · 14 answers · asked by R J 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Thanks these a really good answers.
2007-12-08 14:19:20 · update #1
Mitt doesn't bring religion up. It's the liberal media and the evangelical hypocrites that are making it an issue.
BTW, we use the King James version of the Bible.
2007-12-09 11:18:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Excuse me, but there is no such thing as a Mormon "Bible". They have a "Book of Mormon" that is a SUPPLEMENT to the Bible. If Romney were elected, he would or SHOULD use a KJV Bible.
I've studied Mormonism and the history of it for over 15 years. I lived in a largely populated Mormon town in AZ for over 15 years.
I believe it is a cult, but I'm not saying it is as bad as some other cults. They have some strange beliefs and practices, but this is America and they are entitled to their beliefs.
2007-12-08 22:50:52 · answer #2 · answered by Big Bear 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It's all about conforming to the majority.
The Neocons cannot stand seeing a President being different from they are, that's why a lot of the votes trickled to Huckleberry even though Romney spent millions campaigning in IOWA.
2007-12-08 22:03:14 · answer #3 · answered by Magma H 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
only people bothered Mormons are Southern Baptist "values voters". I found Romney's speech denigrating a phantom "religion of secularism" to be offensive. That would cost Romney far more in the general election, which isn't going to happen.
2007-12-08 22:00:04 · answer #4 · answered by Stewie Griffin 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Um, I don't remember what you're talking about. I'm 45 and can't recall these things occurring. Mitt Romney is a Mormon and JFK was a Catholic and if Mitt can keep his religious viewpoints out of his political life, then I see nothing wrong with it.
2007-12-08 21:58:18 · answer #5 · answered by PURR GIRL TORI 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Im not for Romney.. Im for Clinton but I do not think that his religion shouldnt play a role in the election.. although it will, it is wrong. Most Christians a narrow minded but whatever... and no im not religous.
2007-12-08 22:00:07 · answer #6 · answered by lilrebelbabe1986 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
the same thing happened to JFK. people said his allegiance would be to the Pope. what is being said about Romney just shows how prevalent hypocrisy is in the USA.
2007-12-08 21:58:39 · answer #7 · answered by grumpy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ya i think people should lay off his religion. my problem with romney is i dont trust him to remain conservative because he has gone all flippety floppety before. he does kind of seem like a slick politician type who will say what he needs to. i will vote for him in general election, though, if he gets that far.
2007-12-08 21:58:30 · answer #8 · answered by negaduck 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The Muslim wasn't president...
This nation is full of Christians who think anyone who isn't the exact denomination of Christianity as them will burn in hell, let alone of other religions.
2007-12-08 21:59:05 · answer #9 · answered by Armon92 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
because some Americans are so naive that they don't care if they would be the best president.
it is either what religion, if they are American e.t.c.
like with Romney of Obama it is all rumors.
I think that i will start a rumor that Hillary is pagan
2007-12-08 22:20:23 · answer #10 · answered by liverpool fan MAN U SUCKS 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋