Politics & Government - 20 January 2007

Notice the communist flag Comrade Mandela is standing in front of with South African Communist Party boss, Joe Slovo?

http://www.realnews247.com/how_to_be_a_good_communist.htm

2007-01-20 02:26:11 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2007-01-20 02:23:59 · 4 answers · asked by rani solo 1 in Law & Ethics

Should they not allow wealthy Arabs buy off their leaders/politicians and intefere with their so called democracy which is not even backed up by a written Constitution as does AIPAC in the US.

2007-01-20 02:23:27 · 4 answers · asked by amigo 2 in Other - Politics & Government

2007-01-20 02:23:01 · 3 answers · asked by mikers 3 in Immigration

2007-01-20 02:22:31 · 8 answers · asked by james_sex_coach 1 in Government

2007-01-20 02:22:18 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Elections

A friend of mine was handcuffed and arrested on camera. The questioning began without miranda warnings givin. How could this affect a case on the deffendant?

2007-01-20 02:21:53 · 4 answers · asked by draymond31 1 in Law & Ethics

I am a Swiss-Canadian. I am planning to have children and my question is; Does my status as a holder of two citizenships go to my children aswell?

2007-01-20 02:18:02 · 6 answers · asked by H Vice 3 in Immigration

i want to know when did first corruption case came before & why corruption arises?

2007-01-20 02:17:51 · 2 answers · asked by san_viska 1 in Government

i think she would be better than who we have now. and maybe she is what we need. what is your thought??

2007-01-20 02:16:56 · 14 answers · asked by jeff m 2 in Elections

What training do they get? Are the armed?

2007-01-20 02:14:37 · 13 answers · asked by KRH 3 in Immigration

I mean executed.

2007-01-20 02:14:29 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

when you didn't think your answer was bad. it wasn't a put down.

2007-01-20 02:13:00 · 15 answers · asked by misty blue 6 in Law & Ethics

I know Nazi Pelosi and her group of neo-libs want castrate the INS, but this might be a little hard to explain to the rest of the Republic.

2007-01-20 02:12:30 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

This was a non plan gone terribly bad, however if the police had responded to the 2 911 calls made just after the "kidnapping" it never would have taken place. I think if they had responded right away that this wouldn't even have been considered a kidnapping.

2007-01-20 02:09:42 · 1 answers · asked by ChaliQ 4 in Law Enforcement & Police

2007-01-20 02:09:36 · 1 answers · asked by menno g 2 in Law Enforcement & Police

I am very pleased that my tax dollars are being spent THIS way for a change, instead of covering up the Hastert - Foley scandals that rocked DC last year.

2007-01-20 02:09:11 · 13 answers · asked by Plaxico Domingo 3 in Politics

2007-01-20 02:08:57 · 14 answers · asked by beerman 1 in Politics

are we ready for the first black president?






OBAMA!

2007-01-20 02:04:19 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

and why?

2007-01-20 02:03:19 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

It seems that we are being held back economically by labor unions. Not only have they sent countless jobs overseas, as a result of their exhorbiant wage/benefit demands, but they have historical ties to organized crime (i.e. the Mafia). There are countless stories of labor union corruption, intimidation and racketeering. The thuggery committed in the name of organized labor is immense. Yet unions persist. This is the 21st Century. Isn't it time we got rid of this embarrrasing anachronism from the ancient past?

2007-01-20 02:02:43 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

Another major ice and snow storm from South Texas to Michigan, it looks like with all the other accomplishments like, the internet and saving the Tuna industry they have managed to solve this crisis also!

2007-01-20 02:01:09 · 13 answers · asked by SICKO 2 4 in Politics

Aren't liberals the same people who complain about government spying and protection of rights and privacy? Where's the ACLU?

2007-01-20 02:00:45 · 8 answers · asked by ? 3 in Politics

The second amendment states; "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

When it was written it was referring to the arms of the times; rifles, artillery, pistols. Nowadays arms comprises a very long list including nuclear bombs, biological weapons, (including infectious agents and neurotoxins) as well as automatic and semi-automatic weapons, grenades etc., etc.,

The right of people to bear arms HAS already been infringed because individuals cannot own particularly lethal weapons such as nukes and biological agents. The question is where should we draw the line that both respects the intent of the second amendment and protects the public safety? Where would YOU draw the line?

Please no nonsensical rants. Give me reasoned arguments. Thanks.

2007-01-20 01:59:52 · 9 answers · asked by Dastardly 6 in Politics

I don't want to hear, "It's about time we have a woman in the White House", or "It's about time we have an African American in the White House." Looking beyond that, who would you like to see win and why?

2007-01-20 01:59:49 · 10 answers · asked by Goose 3 in Government

Frankly I love the idea of another president from Arkansas
With her husband who was governor of Arkansas

Now we could have, in the White House, Hilly and Billy.

Does this appeal to you too?

2007-01-20 01:59:29 · 6 answers · asked by Jimfix 5 in Politics

2007-01-20 01:58:18 · 4 answers · asked by Jenny 3 in Law Enforcement & Police

I'm doing a world history report on the country and i can't seem too find anything on the internet?

2007-01-20 01:57:58 · 2 answers · asked by A S H M O E =] 2 in Politics

2007-01-20 01:56:12 · 12 answers · asked by Steve 6 in Politics

I think both are related, and can't be brutally separated. However, let us consider this case.

Let us say in a not-so-liberal country, a film was banned because "it jeopardise national security" (sorry for my lame English),"it depicts explicit sexual images"......... and everyone in that country knows those are just excuses used more than 1000 times. The leader simply don't want the people see the film because that will threaten his/her ruling.

In this case, should the people get a copy of that film, in the name of liberty? Or should they respect the law? (let us say that country is still considered democratic, but since the majority are narrow-minded, no one protested the banning)

Rule of law or Liberty?

2007-01-20 01:55:44 · 3 answers · asked by English Learner 2 in Law & Ethics