i think she would be better than who we have now. and maybe she is what we need. what is your thought??
2007-01-20 02:16:56 · 14 answers · asked by jeff m 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
I didn't vote for our current president in either election, so that speaks to my opinion of him politically.
As for voting for Sen. Clinton, I don't know yet. Actually, I like her, Sen. Obama and John Edwards, so I really need to do some research on all three to see which I like best in the primaries.
More importantly, I think it's a wonderful day in America when we have these three individuals announcing their bid. I just brought my kids in and showed them pictures of all three on the internet and explained that just years ago, this would not have been possible. Who knows what the outcome will be, but this is proof that the Civil Rights movement was for everyone!
Best of luck to all three candidates!
BTW, I voted for Bill Clinton twice, and would do it again if I could!This current administration is clueless in both domestic and foreign matters!
2007-01-20 02:38:28 · answer #1 · answered by Apple21 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
You make the mistake of comparing her to the last person the American people elected.
Mrs Clinton will not be running against George Bush.
I will not vote for her unless John McCain gets the Republican nomination. I will not vote for McCain under any circumstances.
I would even hold my nose and vote for the Clintons.
But I hope I have a better choice than those three jerks!
.
2007-01-20 02:27:47 · answer #2 · answered by John16 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I would vote for a woman, but not Hillary. She supported the war in Iraq. I'd rather see Obama or Edwards win the nomination.
2007-01-20 23:09:58 · answer #3 · answered by milwaukiedave 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary will get enough votes for roughly 3/4 of the electoral vote once Obama grudgingly gives up his seat in the front of the Democrat bus for the one reserved for him in the back.
2007-01-20 02:25:18 · answer #4 · answered by Like, Uh, Ya Know? 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I would NOT vote for Hillary. She would NOT be better (she's a cold, calculating person, and she waffles too much), and she is NOT what we need at ALL.
I might consider voting Democrat in 2008, but if they run Hillary, I don't care WHO the Republicans nominate, I'm voting for them.
2007-01-20 02:21:27 · answer #5 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
This gets a negative response from me based only on the feeling that she does not have the best interests of America as her first priority. Her behavior, historically has been of one who panders to whomever will help her political career and according to many of her constituents, she has been an absentee Senator. Her ideals are far too radical to be accepted by the majority of America, and are based in complete self interest in my opinion.
2007-01-20 02:27:41 · answer #6 · answered by Rich B 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I would!! We need a change in our country after being ruled by Bush for the past 6 years.
2007-01-20 12:23:50 · answer #7 · answered by Katie 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would vote for Hillary in a second.
2007-01-20 02:19:52 · answer #8 · answered by SatanicYoda 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
She is a socialist left wing liberal who wants to tax the hell out of us and if she can destroy our military in the process that will just be a bigger prize to her. She hates the military, make no mistakes. She has more contempt for the military than john kerry does and that is saying something.
2007-01-20 02:21:28 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
A dead dog would be better than what we have now.
I can't see voting for anyone who voted for this war that is doing so much damage to the US.
2007-01-20 02:24:21 · answer #10 · answered by sudonym x 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋