Was it because Saddam was such a nice guy that he would rather lose all his power, his family, and his life than to use his vast stockpiles against those nice invading Americans? Something doesn't quite add up.
Why did the War-Lovers/Profiteers change their excuse from "Everybody in the world thought Saddam had him, so that's why we had to invade" to "Saddam actually had them all along, so we were right to invade."?
Do you think changing the excuse for the blundered war effort will make people want to send their children to fight in Iraq again?
Maybe Christ really was on to something when He said we shouldn't attack people based solely on rumors, suspicions, and innuendo.
2006-08-29
11:30:47
·
50 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Military