In a basically Euclidian geometric universe,and given the essential premise that all geomathematics are based on the hideosly limiting notion that 1+1=2, and not as Ustermayer correctly postulates, that 1 and2 are in fact the same thing observed from different precepts, the theoretical shapes described by Sidis must be; a poly-dri-doc-dec-ahooey-hedron, a hexa-sexa-hedro-adecon and a di-bi-dolly-he-deca-dodron. every thing else is poppycock. Don't you agree?
2006-08-26
10:38:06
·
13 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous