In a basically Euclidian geometric universe,and given the essential premise that all geomathematics are based on the hideosly limiting notion that 1+1=2, and not as Ustermayer correctly postulates, that 1 and2 are in fact the same thing observed from different precepts, the theoretical shapes described by Sidis must be; a poly-dri-doc-dec-ahooey-hedron, a hexa-sexa-hedro-adecon and a di-bi-dolly-he-deca-dodron. every thing else is poppycock. Don't you agree?
2006-08-26 10:38:06 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Food & Drink ➔ Other - Food & Drink
Oh, sure, naturally, sounds delicious. Every thing else is poppycock and I'm allergic to poppycock products.
But I prefer the 5th dimension because my computer uses it...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaluza-Klein_theory
"In modern geometry, the extra fifth dimension can be understood to be the circle group U(1), as electromagnetism can essentially be formulated as a gauge theory on a fiber bundle, the circle bundle, with gauge group U(1)."
2006-08-26 11:08:07 · answer #1 · answered by J Z 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Math is more universal than people think but not from your perspective. A value is a value and if science could be unstable math would be the most stable force. But when it comes to how many dimensions are possible in math but not necessary the universe you are only confined to the computers memory
2006-08-26 10:47:03 · answer #2 · answered by lord_andys_new_id 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely
2006-08-26 10:43:34 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
wow i learned this crap in grade 9 easy and no i dont agree because looking at 1 and 2 as equals has nothing to do with the theoretical shapes and one plus one equaling 2 has nothing to do with ustermayers corret postulates
im 15 and i figured that out
gabriel,15
sweetchildren_1039@yahoo.com
2006-08-26 10:47:06 · answer #4 · answered by sweetchildren_1039 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I feel like Jamie Lee Curtis in a " Fish Called Wanda" when John Cleese starts speaking Russian........
Tell me more
2006-08-26 11:20:53 · answer #5 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'd stick to Mrs Beeton's if I were you. If you really want to venture into mathematics, there's an interesting set of conversion tables in Constance Spry.
2006-08-26 18:12:48 · answer #6 · answered by Trust Me 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no i'm sorry i don't agree with that, you've misinterruped your source material, go back to the library and research throughly and all things surrounding this concept from the beginning of time to the end of mankind as we know it and don't come back until you know it all backwards and in at least ten different languages - good luck!
2006-08-26 10:49:40 · answer #7 · answered by geraldine 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That's easy for you to say, but maybe it all 3 dimensional
2006-08-26 10:43:15 · answer #8 · answered by dragoondf 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, I can certainly see why you classified that question as "Food & Drink". Congratulations.
2006-08-26 10:42:00 · answer #9 · answered by LingXinYi 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hexa-sexa-hedro-adecon?
Di-bi-dolly-he-dodron.?
SUPER-CALI-
-FRAGALISTIC-EXPIALLYDOCIOUS!
2006-08-26 10:45:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋