Specifically, I would like to see any pro AGW reports which deal with water vapor (the primary global warming agent), the decreasing ability of CO2 to warm as more is added to the system, and the effect of clouds to the global warming system.
I think if some of these issues were addressed in a scientific report, many sceptics would consider the theory plausible. For me, I find it impossible to believe in the theory when every article completely dismisses (or minimizes) these important issues. Also, a good explanation of why positive feedback is used by AGW fanatics instead of the most naturally occuring negative feedback. And PLEASE, do not refer to the "consensus" as scientific proof.
2007-11-24
01:32:17
·
5 answers
·
asked by
CrazyConservative
5
in
Global Warming