Has Anyone Read - "Hydrocarbon Fuels Aren't Fossils"?

Question

http://www.mitosyfraudes.org/Ingles2/FossilFuels.html
" Gold's thesis in The Deep Hot Biosphere is simple: Hydrocarbons have been in existence since the earliest times of the universe, and are part of the process of planetary formation. Their constituents, hydrogen and carbon, originated in the "primordial soup" from which Earth was formed. Earth's methane and petroleum, Gold says, are abiogenic - without biological origin." A GREAT READ for THINKING PEOPLE!

I tend to believe this because in Russia they drilled over 7 miles deep to get to a VERY LARGE oil pool!
Logically how can that amount of biological matter sink that deep?
http://www.vialls.com/wecontrolamerica/peakoil.html
Any thinking people out there?

I doubt that Pantagu? read either article.
There is no mention of fossil composition in oil extracted from 7 miles deep. It is well below the Silgan Ring (below any possibility of effects by living matter) - plus the shear volume of oil is beyond any explanation of creation by biomasses.

Answer 1

First of all ,oil doesn't 'sink' to where it is found. Second it is possible to chemicaly verify that the crude oil is in fact derived from fossilized organic material. Third, if there is an unlimited supply of oil ,there is no reason to burn it if we know that causes great harm to the eco-system that we live in. You'll find that even the oil that came from the 7 mi[?] oil well is still fossilized material. Science is the best answer.

Answer 2

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenic_petroleum_origin
is (a) WikiPedia entry.

"the vast majority of Western petroleum geologists consider the biogenic theory of petroleum formation scientifically proven"

Logically, how could the oil be even 7 miles deep, considering it is less dense than rock?

Something must have happened after the crust hardened.