Stephen J Gould made this statement concerning the theory of evolution: "...Thus, if you wish to understand patterns of long historical sequences, pray for randomness."
But random is not a property of evolution at all, it is a statement about our lack of knowledge. Consider the number sequence, 3, 8, 4, 6, 2, 6, 4, 3, 3, 8, 3, 2, 2, ... That sequence seems random but when I tell you that it is numbers from pi, the sequence is no longer random because you can now predict the next numbers. It was random as long as we were ignorance of the facts. So Gould is saying to understand evolution, pray for ignorance. Isn't there something fundamentally wrong with the TOE when we have to pray for ignorance?
2007-12-24
04:25:03
·
4 answers
·
asked by
Matthew T
7
in
Philosophy