Presently, the non-custodial parent pays child support to the custodial parent. Typically, the non-custodial parent gets the child every other weekend, or in an average month, just 4 out of 30 days.
Payment seems backwards to me. Rather, the custodial parent should be required to pay the non-custodial parent to compensate them for the loss of their child.
That is how it works with everything else in a divorce. For example, if one party is awarded the house, that party must pay the other party. Same with a car, boat, or anything else. But, not with a child. Shouldn't who pays whom be reversed?
2007-11-09
14:54:28
·
9 answers
·
asked by
Uhlan
6
in
Law & Ethics