It seems evolutionists always LOVE to point out the resistance of bacteria against certain antibiotics, but this isn't a positive mutation. The bacteria loses the ability to produce the substance that triggers the poison of the antibiotic. At first this may look positive, but it's still a loss of information: mutations only corrupt the current information. Evolutionists LOVE to use natural selection to somehow prove molecules to man evolution happened. Natural selection only selects what it already there..it cannot add anything new.
Evolutionists always love to say that they have transitional fossils that prove evolution, but there are only a handful of debatable fossils in truth. If evolution were true, we should see millions and millions of transitional fossils. We SHOULD see 90% fish 10% mammal, 80% fish 20% mammal, etc. 10% whale 90% cow, 20% whale 80% cow, etc. This is never seen. Evolutionists also sometimes find one or two fossils and imagine what the rest looks like. In addition, they often use drawings instead of showing the bones..why is that?
We also see supposed 'millions of years old' fossilized animals that look EXACTLY like those of today. NO change over 'millions of years.’
The only reason evolutionists find ‘evidence’ of evolution in their mind is because they start off with basic presuppositions: probably that God does not exist or He didn’t create everything all at once.
Sure, creationists have presuppositions as well, but the evidence lines up MUCH better with the creation model: sudden appearance of complex animals, animals producing after their kind, millions of fossils buried in the flood, etc.
Evolutionists like to use the language of speculation, and incorporate it into natural selection in order to make the theory seem more believable. The ‘millions of years’ is the only way they can make it seem plausible.
Romans 1:19-25 describes evolutionists exactly how they are today:
Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.
For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.
Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:
Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
I think it’s wise to trust God more than fallible men. Please take this test if you feel convicted by God:
http://www.livingwaters.com/good/
2007-08-08
16:08:20
·
10 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Religion & Spirituality