The religion of evolution: Can you let me know of any positive mutations?

Question

It seems evolutionists always LOVE to point out the resistance of bacteria against certain antibiotics, but this isn't a positive mutation. The bacteria loses the ability to produce the substance that triggers the poison of the antibiotic. At first this may look positive, but it's still a loss of information: mutations only corrupt the current information. Evolutionists LOVE to use natural selection to somehow prove molecules to man evolution happened. Natural selection only selects what it already there..it cannot add anything new.

Evolutionists always love to say that they have transitional fossils that prove evolution, but there are only a handful of debatable fossils in truth. If evolution were true, we should see millions and millions of transitional fossils. We SHOULD see 90% fish 10% mammal, 80% fish 20% mammal, etc. 10% whale 90% cow, 20% whale 80% cow, etc. This is never seen. Evolutionists also sometimes find one or two fossils and imagine what the rest looks like. In addition, they often use drawings instead of showing the bones..why is that?

We also see supposed 'millions of years old' fossilized animals that look EXACTLY like those of today. NO change over 'millions of years.’

The only reason evolutionists find ‘evidence’ of evolution in their mind is because they start off with basic presuppositions: probably that God does not exist or He didn’t create everything all at once.
Sure, creationists have presuppositions as well, but the evidence lines up MUCH better with the creation model: sudden appearance of complex animals, animals producing after their kind, millions of fossils buried in the flood, etc.

Evolutionists like to use the language of speculation, and incorporate it into natural selection in order to make the theory seem more believable. The ‘millions of years’ is the only way they can make it seem plausible.


Romans 1:19-25 describes evolutionists exactly how they are today:

Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.

For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:

Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.

Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,

And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.

Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:

Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.

I think it’s wise to trust God more than fallible men. Please take this test if you feel convicted by God:
http://www.livingwaters.com/good/

Answer 1

The example I remember most (came from my biology textbook) was about finches in the Galapagos. They showed that one particular species had a short beak, and many years later, showed that same species with much longer beaks. What happened was a few had been born with the longer beaks, and were more adept at getting the larvae in the trees. This would result in them being much healthier, and thus, the females would be more likely to mate with them. Then, babies would be born with the same characteristic (the longer beak), and viola. Evolution.

Many Christians accept this form of evolution, as it does not have to oppose the Bible. You can still believe God made man and all the creatures on earth, and that after long amounts of time, certain animals had to adapt to their environment.

I, personally believe that humans evolved.

Answer 2

It is difficult to explain, even in simplest terms, scientific realities to a person with absolutely no concept of what science is about. When bacteria GAIN the abilility to RESIST the effects of a toxic substance, against which they formerly had no means of self-defence, this is certainly a positive, useful, and lifesaving mutation. Bacteria do not "trigger" the effects of antibiotics. They simply die from them - until they evolve some means of protecting themselves. For heaven's sake, do a little basic reading before you start writing!

http://evolution.berkeley.edu/

Transitional fossils? Here you go:

http://talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-transitional.html

Fossils millions of years ago that are exactly like species living today? Nope, sorry. There is no species living today that was alive 5 million years ago. There are a few groups in which the species of 5 million years ago are SIMILAR to those of today. And many other groups where the species of 5 million years ago (an extremely short time in evolutionary history) are vastly different from those of today.

And finally, I do know God, I do glorify His holy name, and I am thankful to Him for all that I have, including my salvation. Judge not, lest ye also be judged.

Answer 3

a lot of people say they dont believe in anything that they can not see. you cant see gravity but you know its real. you cant see love but you know if you feel it.

and some will say i know gravity is real because when i jump off my bed i land on the ground.

well the same is to be said about god. look around, you think everything got this way from a rock hitting another rock? thats like saying a tornado hits a junk yard and when the wind stops you would have a brand new jumbo jet.

love each other

Answer 4

You do realise that pointing out what you see as issues in the most accurate theory of progression in life doesn't mean that your creation mythology somehow becomes the title holder.

Here's an idea. Rather than spitting on what you see as competition, how about you go and research some evidence that supports your version of events.

Answer 5

A positve mutation could be that animals, pre-humans mated only to perpetuate the species. Now, we can mate just for love. I consider that a positive mutation. AND I don't argue, using a LOT of words, trying to convince anyone of that. JUST BELIEVE!

Answer 6

Very nice presentation. However, do you have any sources to back up the things you mentioned? I know that MANY will demand proof for the things you claim.

GOD bless

Answer 7

you're right, there are no positive mutations because they all result in a loss or a corruption of the genetic material

Answer 8

Every single thing on your dinner plate is a result of positive mutations; without such mutations, most of the world would long since have starved to death. Evolution is now a proven fact; proof details are available on request. (Please provide an e-mail address.)

Answer 9

Oh so you wrote such a long story of horse crap to convince the intelligent side?
Go back and delude yourself with your delusional friends.

Answer 10

If you can get this published in Nature then I will give a F***

Otherwise, how about you let scientists do the science and you can continue doing whatever it is that you do.