It just dawned on me that a world with a salty ocean and non-salty inland lakes can never have been completely submerged in water, like the Genesis account tells us. In fact, the global flood hypothesis makes a testable, falsifiable prediction: the salt levels in all standing bodies of water should be similar. Here's why:
Imagine a world with a salty ocean and non-salty inland lakes. Now, the water rises to cover all land, which removes all boundaries between the bodies of water and connects them all. A fish, for instance, would be able to swim from any point on earth to any other. More to the point, any salt in the salty oceans would, by natural physical laws of diffusion, begin to spread into this world sea. In addition, thermal currents and other "mixing" effects would accelerate the process. 40 days and 40 nights would be plenty of time to gain an equilibrium - all salt levels would be the same, everywhere.
When the waters receded back, whatever was left behind, whether in the ocean or in the inland lakes, would be equally salty. Salt doesn't evaporate, so where is it? It isn't there. The global flood hypothesis is falsified. QED.
2007-06-20
07:33:47
·
8 answers
·
asked by
SonniS
4
in
Earth Sciences & Geology