Any of the top Generals in the US. millitary have most likely, spent the majority of, if not their entire adult lives learning how to, (most basically put) lead our millitary. The duty given to and the trust that has been earned by our top generals deserve more respect then I think Bush has given them. I think its safe to say no one would vote for Bush to hold any of the top Millitary positions. So why does he think his millitary stratigies are more sound The qualifications to be Commander in Cheif are laughable in contrast to that of Generals. .
I just would like to better understand how Bush could believe his plan could be more sound then a General who have been intruseof the most powerful millitary on the Planet? Does Bush have an obligation to do what the US population demands? Or is he obligated to do what HE BELIEVES is best for the country? As of right now what are Bush's obligation? Would it be ok for him to call all our troops home & let Iraq deal w/ itself?
2007-02-13
03:45:52
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Eric C
1
in
Government