I know a lot you guys won’t agree with this, but this has been on my mind for a while now and I would expect mature and respectful answers.
Michael Jackson: Once a part of the biggest groups of Motown and know as the king of pop. Yet a two child molestation accusations ruined him. He’s best know for that, and his “Bleached skin” (Get real, there’s not that much bleach in the world that could’ve did that as black as he was). But why is that so important. Should you judge Michael for his music and his crazy behavior? You try being in show business since age 5 and see how sane you are. About the molestation case, shouldn’t you blame the money hungry parent for letting him spend the night, knowing full well of his previous accusations? He’d already paid off one case (Big mistake). Since the jury found him not guilty, he’s still getting a bad rap from what I’d like to call haters. Who knows if he did it or not? Were we there? Were we in his room?
Janet Jackson: She took control and did it well. She was known as the sane Jackson, that is until the super bowl. They wouldn’t play her videos and a lot of radio stations didn’t play her records, which made her last album be viewed as her weakest with the publicity surrounded this, although it sold really well. Janet and Justin said that is was a mistake. Justin got off after he apologized, in my eyes, with no scares (or not as bad as Janet’s was). Janet? She apologized and she continues to be tormented over a boob with a ring in it. FOR WHAT?!!! There are worse things on T.V than that and it gets looked over all the time. The Red Hot Chili Peepers did a show in tube socks and didn’t get this kind off treatment. She said it was mistake. Can’t we leave it at that? She said she was sorry.
So again, the question is at the top and yellow. Answer maturely and respectfully, even if you don’t agree.
2006-09-20
01:39:54
·
15 answers
·
asked by
D-Wizzle
2
in
Celebrities