I read something here that said aluminum bindings dont flex with the board and so are not as good. Aluminum ones like the Burton c60 and so forth cost alot. Does Burton throw aluminum into the mix just to spark sales? Ex. p1 vrs. c60.
This is what this website http://www.wiredsport.com/02snowbindingfacts.htm had to say:
Aluminum Alloy: Portions of many bindings are made from aluminum, and the notion exists, "aluminum is more substantial than plastic. It will last longer, and weigh less". This can be very misleading. 1.) Aluminum is a horrible base (and disk) material for snowboard bindings. A snowboard must flex evenly to perform well. Any bindings restrict this even flex a bit, as they present two hard, static plates which must be screwed firmly to the board. Aluminum is an extremely rigid material. This leads to the board flexing, and the bindings remaining rigid. At best this leads to a "kinked" flex pattern to the board. At worst it leads to board damage or binding damag
2007-02-16
18:42:15
·
3 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Snowboarding