An undefeated record or quality of opposition? Many cite Rocky Marciano's 49-0 record as proof positive that he was the greatest heavyweight ever. But what great champions wouldn't have been 49-0 against that opposition? Conversely, Muhammad Ali's opposition was devastating from stem to stern. A collection of beautiful boxers and devastating sluggers. I'm not so sure Rocky would have retired undefeated if he'd had to face the likes of Sonny Liston, George Foreman, Larry Holmes or Joe Frazier. Heck, Jimmy Ellis, Jimmy Young, Ron Lyle, George Chuvalo and Earnie Shavers could have made it a rough night for Rocky. Everyone else did, why not they?
The Rock was a great fighter, but he fought during one of the weakest stretches in the division's history. Charles, Louis, Walcott and Moore were all old men, well past their respective primes.
So I ask you, what is more important in determining greatness? Opposition or an undefeated record? Thanks all for listening to my bs!
2007-04-29
08:26:27
·
4 answers
·
asked by
douglas c
3