Religion & Spirituality - 14 November 2007

a Supreme Being as a premise, or do they object to the current Theory of Evolution, specifically?

2007-11-14 00:15:50 · 7 answers · asked by I'm an Atheist 3

2007-11-14 00:14:29 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-14 00:12:56 · 23 answers · asked by pushpam 2

2007-11-14 00:11:46 · 17 answers · asked by trinity 5

Atheists say that He doesn't exist. But how do any of you explain His miracles? I was diagnosed with so many diseases I gave up on myself. But you know what? He was there. He was always beside me, holding my hand, telling me it's all right. Even when I denied Him, He never left me because He loves me. Not only me, but all of you. All of us. So why can't atheists open their eyes? You cannot see God, but you need to sense Him. That is what makes Him so precious, so why?

2007-11-14 00:11:22 · 31 answers · asked by leyenda_asturias 3

2007-11-14 00:09:27 · 6 answers · asked by carl 4

Have you heard that there was a study done by doctors and researchers to proof or disprove the existance of the soul, through weighing a person before and after death?
(The doctors and researchers determined that the soul weighs twenty-one grams.)

Do you agree or disagree with these findings?

2007-11-14 00:06:10 · 16 answers · asked by Jaye16 5

2007-11-14 00:05:20 · 12 answers · asked by carl 4

Many people seem to think that evolution works entirely by 'chance'. But chance is only part of the story. If it were really the only factor, here's how the show 'Pop Idol' would work:

o Pop Idol announces a new contest, and 10,000 random people turn up for audition. All of the entrants completely different. Some have no singing ability whatsoever. Those that do have different styles, voices, personalities and presentations.

o From these, 100 people are selected at random, with no regard to their abilities.

o The 100 are a random subset of the initial 10,000 entrants, and so have no more talent and ability than the general public.

o In the next step a further random sampling reduces the contestants down to 8. No testing or judging is done.

o Finally, a winner is chosen at random. This contestant is crowned the Pop Idol of the Year, and has a record deal with a major company.

Would anyone run a contest this way? Would science support a theory that worked like this?

2007-11-14 00:04:19 · 25 answers · asked by Super Atheist 7