a Supreme Being as a premise, or do they object to the current Theory of Evolution, specifically?
2007-11-14 00:15:50 · 7 answers · asked by I'm an Atheist 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
The "beginning of the world" HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH evolution... so your answer is being ignored.
2007-11-14 00:24:11 · update #1
a "beginning" has NOTHING TO DO WITH evolution, so your answer is being ignore, also
2007-11-14 00:25:44 · update #2
the first poster is a prime example of someone who lacks the will to understand anything related to science. According to his way of thinking; it is easier to just say god did it, rather than take the time to do research to understand things.
2007-11-14 00:21:51 · answer #1 · answered by Imagine No Religion 6 · 6⤊ 1⤋
At perfect you will get some re-technology of identification (which, as youthful earth creationists, they probable do not join.) this query is a waste, my chum, of 5 factors. The Bible is the sole little bit of "evidence" they have. I had a protracted and drawn out communicate board communicate with a slightly sensible creationist who saved dodging the query till it finally got here to, "technology is fantastic as long because it would not contradict the Bible." nicely, what are you able to assert to that?
2017-01-05 11:25:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most of those who object this theory of evolution would probably object other scientific theories as well, I think most of them just prefere magic rather than logical explanation
2007-11-14 00:21:17 · answer #3 · answered by larissa 6 · 8⤊ 1⤋
It's not evolution in particular they have beef with, it's anything that suggests that their religion isn't 100% accurate.
2007-11-14 01:52:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
I don't object to the current theory, I just see a lot of holes in it and I'm waiting for them to put it all together.
But yes, I'd probably object to any "beginning of the world" theory that didn't include a Supreme Being, it simply doesn't make sense to me. Mainly because I know He exists.
If you don't know He exists, you won't see my side of it :)
2007-11-14 00:21:03 · answer #5 · answered by arewethereyet 7 · 3⤊ 7⤋
i have yet to even see a theory that would get rid of a supreme being, because no mater what their theory it had a beginning and something that did not have a beginning (God) had to start it.
2007-11-14 00:21:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 6⤋
Yes I would object......
Everything needs a builder.......except God who is eternal.
And the current theory holds no water either.......total lie.
2007-11-14 00:18:43 · answer #7 · answered by primoa1970 7 · 3⤊ 10⤋