Many Christians I have spoken with believe that people who do not believe as they do or people who do not love Jesus will suffer eternal torment in hell. The question I have for believers who adhere to this doctrine is this: Can love be bought with threats of harm or with promises of reward?
If you love Jesus because you want something (heaven) from him, how are you any different than a prostitute? In this case, what is it that you really love: Jesus or the thought of heaven?
On the other side of the coin, is it right to worship something simply because you fear it? Is it right to bow to a dictator, no matter how evil this dictator is, if doing so will keep you from going to the gas chambers or to the ovens? Who is more worthy of admiration, an individual who refuses to succumb to an evil dictator, regardless of the threats of harm, or an individual who sells his soul for the promise of a reward?
Looking at it in a slightly different way, if a man said to a woman, "Love me or I will hurt you" is there anyone in their right mind who believes that the woman would really love the man to avoid being hurt? She might profess love and she might, in order to avoid being hurt, behave in a manner that seems loving, but deep down inside, I doubt that she would ever really be able to love such an individual. I know I wouldn't.
What would Christians who believe that hell awaits those who do not become Christians think of a mother who said to her child, "Love me by the time you are six, or I will bake you in the oven." In this case, the parent does give the child a choice, but what kind of choice is it?
Some Christians have compared Jesus sending people to hell to a parent who says to a child, "Don't go into the street or you will be hit by a car." This analogy fails, however, for many reason, the most obvious one being that in the case of Jesus, hell (unlike the cars) does not exist beyond his ability to control it. A more accurate version of the analogy of the parent warning his child about the dangers of going into the street would be a parent who says to his child, "Don't go into the street or you will be hit by a car." Then when the child goes into the street, the parent jumps into his car and runs the child over.
Many Christians, when evangelizing, attempt to paint a kind and compassionate portrait of Jesus by stressing how deeply saddened he is when he has to put people in hell. However, if the parent who bakes her child in the oven when the child fails to love her weeps as she preheats the oven in which to bake her child, would we really believe that she was grieved over her decision? Or if a parent weeps as he beats his child to death, should this cause us to believe that the parent is a compassionate and loving individual, who only has his child's best interest at heart?
Some people might argue with these analogies, saying that not everyone is God's child. Even if this is true, however, unless you are a Calvinist, you would have to believe that God loves everyone and desires for everyone to come to know him. If God really does wish for everyone to know and love him, then why would he put a limited-time-offer on his invitation to know him and why would he endlessly torture people who failed to accept his invitation? Only the most egotistical and psychotic of lovers tortures those who fail to accept his offer for a dinner date, and we as a society agree that an individual who hurts those who fail to love him should be severely punished. If we as a society agree that this type of behavior is psychotic and worthy of punishment, why do we glorify these monstrous and hitleresque qualities in a god?
Some people say that our society is sick and that we as a people are in need of salvation. Perhaps there is some truth to this. But is the religion (Christianity) adopted by our society really the cure or is it merely one more manifestation of the disease?
2006-07-05
11:11:07
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Mahfuz R
1