Evolution argument 2?

Question

Evolutionists do not have solid support from science when they say everything has “evolved”.

In fact, evolutionists who reject God and miracles have three of the biggest problems in the universe.

Problem No. 2
No scientific law can account for non-living things’ coming to life. The soil in your garden didn't turn into the trees and flowers. They came from seeds, cuttings, or grafts from other trees and flowers.

Atheistic evolutionists have long believed that at some time in the distant past, life arose from non-living substances. British biologist T.H. Huxley in 1869 and physicist John Tyndall in 1874 were early promoters of the idea that life could be generated from inorganic chemicals. But biology has found no law to support this idea, and much against it. The invariable observation is that only living things give rise to other living things. Life could not begin if God and miracles took no part!
want more? http://www.users.bigpond.com/rdoolan/evoluwrong.html

Answer 1

Possibilities
The answer is yes. Is it possible that there is no creator and that humans came to exist through evolution from apes, that evolved from lungfish, that evolved from single-celled organisms, that came from water and sunlight, resulting from being a certain distance from the Sun, which was cause by the localization of hydrogen, which was probably caused by the explosion of a star. Is it possible that we are here by chance and there is no purpose in humans other than to live here on this world for as long as we can. Is it possible that we were all created by an infinite complexity, or a God and that the whole universe is meant for us. Answering no to any of these questions has a very powerful meaning. If we don’t accept that there are possibilities outside our inherent beliefs, then we are ignorant to them and therefore accept that we have a mind closed to these possibilities. If we can’t have discussions about our thoughts and beliefs without resulting in a circular argument or an end statement leaving out the realm of all possibilities, then we must accept the fact that our minds are shutting out the possibilities otherwise. Any statement must be made with absolute proof and must be able to endure all criticism before it can be worthy enough to be a belief, and even then it may not be absolutely certain.

Answer 2

I'm not sure there's a question in your ramblings, except for "want more?" Do I want more what? More of your ramblings? No thanks.

I gather that you believe in a god or some supreme being who brought everything together, at a particular place and time, and life evolved. Oops, sorry. My bad! Didn't mean to use the "E" word. Let me try again. Your god or supreme being created the seed that eventually evolves into a tree or flower. Darn it!!! There's that pesky "E" word again!

Why can't you accept the possibility that your god or supreme being allowed EVOLUTION to happen???

Answer 3

Wow are you a moron! The stupid fairy sure left you a double helping this morning did'nt she?

See that big yellow ball in the sky? It's called the SUN. It provides us with ENERGY. All kinds of energy.
Even the kind, and try and keep up here as this gets complicated, that makes non-living seeds, come to life.
Isn't that cool? And doesn't that make short work of your Pious Fraud?
You bet it does.
Do I want more? Sure, I'm always happy to b itch slap the uneducated with thier own stupidity. Bring it on!

Answer 4

wrong again. Scientists don't reject god (I wish they did!)

All that ignores the fact that evidence has been collected for about 3,000 years that finally pointed us inthe direction that evolution occurred. You are playing semantic games with your limited understanding of science (somethign from nothing!! life from non-life!!! arghh!!!!) and ignoring the fact that evolution has been shown time and time again to explain just about everything we know about modern biology.

Answer 5

Ok. Scientists have created cells that can convert light into energy, from what? you guessed it. Chemicals.

Scientists have created DNA that uses 6 artificial nucleotides and and can replicate, from what? you guessed it again. You're so smart. Chemicals.

Answer 6

Wow, a Creationist using the "if you can't see it, then how do you know it exists" argument. Reminds me of the pot and kettle.

P.S. miracles do not prove God's existence, ever hear of happenstance?

Answer 7

take it to church.... then go to college and learn something. What your saying is not only dumb, but hardly credible from someone whose entire belief system is based on conjecture and faith. Are we supposed to believe anything that you brand as TRUTH only because you feel we should? how about you live and let live instead??

Answer 8

*sigh* Once again, the great excuse. "We don't know how it happened, so god did it!" Wrong. You just don't know. That's it. ADMIT IT! YOU DON'T KNOW! Come on! Say it! You'll feel better without the lies, trust me. Lose the arrogance and admit you don't know something, theist!

Answer 9

Nothing in your post is true. Where did you come up with this idea? You really need to go to college.

Answer 10

hey i dont care wat those people b 4 me said but i think u hav a point. people r just makin the lamest excuses 4 evolution. agin i say LAME!!!!!