my argument
Being rational is having everything based on evidence and judging in a logical way.
1) lets assume God doesn't exist. A watch is a complex design and the watch has a designer.
2) All complex designs in this world has an designer except nature (assuming God doesn't exist) things such as computers, televisions, babies, my homework, and ect.
3) Nature and life is a complex design (atoms, molecules, cells, organs, and ect).
4) There is no absoulte proof of what created life. Most are all theories.
5) Judging from my limited knowledge and my own observation of intelligent works of design that I know are created by an designer, I should believe it is highly likely nature and life has a designer.
From this I believe a rational person should believe in God. If a person does not base his beliefs on experiences from his own observations and derive an answer from his current knowledge than he is irrational. This does not prove if God is good or bad.
2007-12-06
11:42:32
·
12 answers
·
asked by
Aragon
1
in
Religion & Spirituality