I have noticed when discussing bad behavior, and someone points out that Christians have also engaged in that bad behavior, there seems to be two common responses.
If the behavior in question is REALLY bad, (mass murder, torture, etc) then the answer seems to be "well, they weren't really Christian".
Milder bad behavior seems to be explained away by saying "Christians aren't perfect, just forgiven" or "Christians are still human, and will still make mistakes".
This confuses me, because I thought the fundamentalist standard was "sin is sin". So why do some sins mean the person or person in question really isn't/wasn't a Christian and some sins just mean that the person is a forgiven Christian, who is still human and still subject to sin ?
What's the dividing line between a forgiven Christian and a false Christian.
And why is that when non-Christians engage in the same behavior that would be considered ok for a "forgiven" Christian, they are still considered evil ?
2007-10-10
15:18:03
·
21 answers
·
asked by
queenthesbian
5
in
Religion & Spirituality