Evolutionary theory declares that everything has a mere appearance of design. Richard Dawkins is probably the leading proponent of evolutionary theory.
Dawkins writes: Biology is the study of complicated things that give the appearance of having been designed for a purpose.
He goes on to say: ..the living results of natural selection overwhelmingly impress us with the appearance of design as if by a master watchmaker...
Nevertheless, Dawkins is an atheist who staunchly maintains that the design we see is merely an illusion -- that these amazingly complex systems are an accidental product of natural selection.
Interestingly, in all other fields of human endeavor we find that "design necessitates a designer." Thus, design detection methodology is a prerequisite for many disciplines, including archaeology, anthropology, etc.
Because of the metaphysical implications of life resulting from "Intelligent Design", a surprisingly large number of us seek to reject the foregoing statements and find a mechanism by which complex biologic machines may arise naturally by random chance.
However, I was now seeing a tremendous inconsistency...
When it comes to the origin of life there are only two possibilities: creation or spontaneous generation. There is no third way. Spontaneous generation was disproved one hundred years ago, but that leads us to only one other conclusion, that of supernatural creation. We cannot accept that on philosophical grounds; therefore, we choose to believe the impossible: that life arose spontaneously by chance!
2006-12-23
15:42:23
·
15 answers
·
asked by
?
4
in
Religion & Spirituality