Or their children having sex with one another. And they only had two sons. Kind of tricky, no?
I asked this a few minutes ago, but please consider this:
So, let me get this straight, of the answers so far, most Christians are advocating/excusing/justifying incest? Come on, you can do better than that! Are you really saying that you have faith in a doctrine that advocated incest? Would you have sex with your brother or sister? And these phony genetic arguments you are coming up with are just wrong - there would have been no genetic variation, so all the sons/grandsons/etc would have all turned out pretty much the same as one another. There would have been no variation for eye/hair/skin color as a small example. If you admit then that there was genetic variation, you are admiting the possibility of evolution, which I thought you were all against. Mind you, I thought you were against incest up till now...
2006-07-24
07:37:02
·
6 answers
·
asked by
blah de blah de blah...
3
in
Religion & Spirituality