[therefore they are entitled to limitless reward?]
if they are working smarter, they are using nature's gifts of 'smartness' & therefore are not entitled to reward for nature's gifts? if they are rewarded for smarts, then the wrong person is rewarded? it is rewarding the person for another's [nature's] contribution? the smarts are no effort, no sacrifice of time or life or energy or anything by the person rewarded? we should [for justice, ie peace, democracy, sustainable capitalism, preservation of the state, law, order, happiness, pleasure, leisure, freedom from terrorism, war & crime, problems, troubles, anxieties, pains, griefs, and all things good] only compensate [=pay] for personal loss [of time, life, energy, etc] not for having nature's gifts? since the person gave nothing [in the effortless natural use of the smarts], it robs everyone else to reward for nothing?
giving $500,000/hr is giving 50,000 hrs of others' work [time life energy] [welth & powr] for one hr's work?
2006-10-19
11:03:52
·
2 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Economics