English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Of course I challenged it because it was a double entendre and technically can only be deemed offensive by the reader's mind and not by the content. I can only control content, not interpretation. That is a Yahoo issue, not mine.

2006-10-19 12:33:12 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science Other - Social Science

I answered a DoubleD question about Santa stuffing her stockings. Crazy azz gestapos. I said Santa would stuff her stockings if she would share her cookies. I said he would also give some yule log. None of that is adult in nature UNLESS you interpret it as dirty, In that case, I can't be responsible for the interpretation. I am only responsible for the words and they are not dirty.

2006-10-19 20:05:43 · update #1

6 answers

ITS ALL GOOD......

2006-10-19 12:50:21 · answer #1 · answered by bigmommy240 3 · 0 0

I'm not sure this is something to brag about......Was it a misunderstanding, or were you trying to insult someone?

2006-10-19 12:52:35 · answer #2 · answered by Krash 2 · 0 0

Was it meant to be offensive? Or was it just inconsiderate?

2006-10-19 12:39:39 · answer #3 · answered by pandora the cat 5 · 0 0

I've had one violation, that's it.

2006-10-20 12:34:41 · answer #4 · answered by *babydoll* 6 · 0 0

so? what is there answer?

2006-10-19 12:50:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

none ;P

2006-10-19 12:40:16 · answer #6 · answered by phobic_42 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers