A recent study confirms earlier research suggesting that people who have up to 30 drinks per week are smarter, better educated, and earn more money than teetotalers. Specifically, men who drink earn 19% more than men who don’t, and for women, bar-babes earn 23% more than their sober sisters. Additionally, if you go to a bar at least once a month you get a bonus, literally. People who guzzle wine are the big winners, coming in with a salary around $60,000.
I think this disparity is caused by one specific segment of the non-drinking population that is so stupid they can drag down the average of 10-times their number: Right-wing Fundamentalist Christians (RFC). At least when a drunk wakes up the morning that’s as stupid and as bad as he is going to feel all day. When an RFC wakes up, that’s as not-stupid and the best he is going to feel all day.
Are there any other sub-groups that can match RFCs dead-brain-cell for dead-brain-cell and similarly skew the results?
2006-09-15
16:32:08
·
21 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Sociology