Astronomy & Space - September 2006

hi
as we know gravity and its effects ..
i really wanna know what creats gravity..
on earth we can say its is the sheer attraction of two objects in space..

and one of the reasons why gravity exists is due to the heat source of the sun and the core of the earth and other planets,,

but a black hole has no mass at all its smaller than a speck of sand so far we understand.........
then how come is this small black hole has immense gravity....
so much of gravity enough to destroy the whole milky way galaxy in the coming 50 million years......!!

oh and i am not bothered or worried of the planet as my very existence is not possible by that time ...

but this question might answer me from you what to do and what to understand to live a better life ...so please answer the right way...
because this is surely not an other stupid question !!!!!!

2006-09-16 02:45:05 · 7 answers · asked by kiss k 2

To keep future moon visitors from messing with this historical location.

and/or the other moon landing sites?

Who wants to start a petition?

2006-09-16 02:30:28 · 10 answers · asked by Brendan G 4

... of Ward and Brownlee?

Do you think it has laid waste to the Drake Equation?

2006-09-16 02:18:12 · 4 answers · asked by Brendan G 4

2006-09-16 02:03:20 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-16 01:56:28 · 16 answers · asked by deshanto 2

If so, would it be unpunishable when I returned to Earth? How far do our laws reach or does it depend on the victim’s nationality?

2006-09-16 00:51:04 · 33 answers · asked by Mike N 2

2006-09-16 00:48:10 · 34 answers · asked by Muralater!!!! 4

2006-09-16 00:43:40 · 17 answers · asked by Lol 1

2006-09-16 00:32:13 · 31 answers · asked by Lol 1

Recently, the World body concluded that since Pluto did not contribute to the essential characteristics of a planet, and possibly got gravitated towards Neptune, another planet's orbit, Pluto was shown the door. I wonder as our knowledge of universe (with all its milky ways and galaxies, emerging or collapsing stars ) expands exponentially, sooner or later, it appears to me, we may be classifying one day Sun as a dwarf star, not doing perfectly the functions of a Star. Does anyone around feel it is possible?

2006-09-15 23:57:45 · 15 answers · asked by surybore 2

2006-09-15 23:47:12 · 6 answers · asked by catweazle 5

2006-09-15 23:45:49 · 11 answers · asked by TM 1

My son is 8 and wants to learn about astronomy (i know zero about it either!), but the websites i have seen seem to be written by people who have forgotten what it was like to know absolutely nothing about astronomy.We need something that starts with the absolute basics-everything! Anyone know of such a site? Thanks

2006-09-15 22:12:02 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

as u all know pluto no longer has the privilage of being one of the solar system planets , due to its small size its now classified as a dworf planet ,,also the name "pluto" has been replaced with a number : 134340 !!

2006-09-15 21:34:29 · 18 answers · asked by sugar 3

2006-09-15 21:31:47 · 8 answers · asked by KARIZMATIC_VJ 1

I recently read a new planet was detected 450 lighyears, can it be possible that the planet doesn't exist anymore? and we are just detecting the light that was projected by it. If what we see is what light reflects then wouldn't scientist be detecting a planet that was there 450 years ago. In other words if someone is in that planet right now looking at earth, wouldn't that person be looking at the very past?

2006-09-15 20:53:29 · 12 answers · asked by Marcus 2

It forms at high altitudes,It starts with the letter C
and ends with the letter L

2006-09-15 20:06:56 · 8 answers · asked by krx 1

Do astronauts get internet in space?

2006-09-15 19:46:12 · 8 answers · asked by jason g 2

Everyone keeps asking that. Why?

http://www.cyberwitch.com/wychwood/Observatory/askJohnHarper.asp?id=1875
http://www.cyberwitch.com/wychwood/Observatory/askJohnHarper.asp?id=1872
http://www.cyberwitch.com/wychwood/Observatory/askJohnHarper.asp?id=1831
http://www.cyberwitch.com/wychwood/Observatory/askJohnHarper.asp?id=1798
http://www.cyberwitch.com/wychwood/Observatory/askJohnHarper.asp?id=1778
http://www.cyberwitch.com/wychwood/Observatory/askJohnHarper.asp?id=1768
http://www.cyberwitch.com/wychwood/Observatory/askJohnHarper.asp?id=1755
http://www.cyberwitch.com/wychwood/Observatory/askJohnHarper.asp?id=1752
http://www.cyberwitch.com/wychwood/Observatory/askJohnHarper.asp?id=1732
http://www.cyberwitch.com/wychwood/Observatory/askJohnHarper.asp?id=1639
http://sg.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20060704225358AAY06Hm
http://sg.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20060904232139AAwkryn
http://sg.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20060627235201AAKNo0e
Lots more...!!

2006-09-15 19:38:30 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

will be forming a relationship just like our solar system but instead of planets, they are stars aligned for its revolutionary tracts?

2006-09-15 18:30:20 · 6 answers · asked by wacky_racer 5

2006-09-15 18:20:03 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

My question is about the expanding universe.Alot of scientists have compare the expanding universe like a ballom that is being blow up.now with the ballon there is an appossing force that presses againts the ballon.So my question is with the expaning universe is there a force thats pushing back against the expanding universe?

2006-09-15 17:34:04 · 11 answers · asked by neutrinoman2 1

Is the earth static?
Is the Sun the center of the solar system?
What church and Islam says about moving of earth?

2006-09-15 17:33:49 · 17 answers · asked by Tanvir 2

2006-09-15 14:55:41 · 12 answers · asked by pickitngrin 2

Think about all of the exhibits out there that will need at least some modifications: schools, musuems, planetariums, publishing companies, the list goes on.

Most will probably put a big "X" over Pluto, but for others it may be more costly.

What do you think? Millions of dollars?

2006-09-15 13:17:02 · 15 answers · asked by powhound 7

As the earth moves around the Sun, spining on it's axis as it goes, the front side of the earth (at that moment in time) would seem to be more likely to run into an asteroid. Is this correct? Is the probability less that an asteroid would "run up behind" the earth and hit from the "back side", at that moment in time? If true, wouldn't that mean that the highest probability of an asteroid impact would be during the hours of midnight to noon. Do you agree?

2006-09-15 12:52:34 · 14 answers · asked by flightsimulator58 2

2006-09-15 12:37:41 · 10 answers · asked by ryoheisukichan 1

2006-09-15 12:33:39 · 22 answers · asked by Soul-Unleashed 2

It just cant be there it had to be made by some process.beyond the universe.

2006-09-15 12:31:19 · 38 answers · asked by gojoe 1

http://www.ufos-aliens.co.uk/cosmicapollo.html

This has to be the biggest cover-up in history considering there are still big majority people who still think we landed on it. Well before you answer at least read this page or even parts of it and tell me we landed on the Moon.

2006-09-15 12:27:48 · 16 answers · asked by Moon Man 1