Astronomy & Space - September 2006

2006-09-01 17:39:18 · 18 answers · asked by geovani5589 2

2006-09-01 17:38:29 · 17 answers · asked by Kevin H. 3

I found a website which is: http://www.geocities.com/blobrana/features/1950da.html

stating that 1950 DA is an asteroid that will set humans to their extinction. True?

Myans or Aztecs predicted 2012 to be the end of the world, so when's the real end?

No religious answers please, I'm more of a scientologist looking for a physical answer.

2006-09-01 17:35:02 · 17 answers · asked by Homer 4

im thinking i would be crushed into a peice the size of a coulple of atoms because of the gravity

2006-09-01 17:29:23 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

my feeling is that yes, it does cost a ton of money to build space ships, maintain them, fuel them up and send them into outer space, but then i look at the fact that the money that is spent is being re-circulated back into the economy via jobs, businesses, etc. and i feel better about it...any body else have any thoughts?

2006-09-01 15:39:40 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-01 15:31:06 · 9 answers · asked by E=MC hammer 2

2006-09-01 14:46:14 · 7 answers · asked by Kevin H. 3

2006-09-01 14:23:21 · 9 answers · asked by suzie a 1

2006-09-01 14:08:42 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-01 13:57:44 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-01 13:51:58 · 52 answers · asked by kentdaniel27 1

science and philosophy view....

2006-09-01 13:38:27 · 15 answers · asked by ink 2

I know about the doppler wobble, what are the other options?

2006-09-01 12:59:35 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-01 11:53:37 · 6 answers · asked by tom science 4

2006-09-01 11:45:08 · 25 answers · asked by ♫♪♫TAY-LUR♫♪♫ 3

The total amount of mass that is observed in our Universe is much smaller than the total quantity of mass required to account for the total gravitational pull that is present. Therefore the existence of a mysterious unobservable kind of matter is postulated("Black matter"), Could it be that this "Black matter" is no more or less than all the matter that has been accumilated in the gravity traps called "Black holes"? Such matter is (almost) unobservable , but does still exert its gravitational pull. Of course this means that the quantity of matter present in Black holes must be vastly larger than assumed until now. But why not? Black holes being alone in empty space, with no more matter around them to suck in, would be practically unobservable. One can imagine that such "lone" Black holes could originate from the collapse into one point of complete Galaxies or even clusters of Galaxies.
Or alternatively:
Very large numbers of "small" Black holes that also are almost unobservable?

2006-09-01 11:45:03 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-01 11:09:20 · 11 answers · asked by tom science 4

Come on, just do a coin flip..........works for sporting events.

2006-09-01 10:16:38 · 12 answers · asked by Lord L 2

reply with their names

2006-09-01 10:06:12 · 17 answers · asked by yuva_quiz2me 1

why didn't the russians still try for the moon. after we got there?

2006-09-01 09:58:13 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

I'm having to use the encyclopedia to look things up. Is it supposed to be this difficult to comprehend?

2006-09-01 08:50:38 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

Or it just a theory?

2006-09-01 08:38:53 · 22 answers · asked by Marilyn Monroe 2

2006-09-01 08:22:24 · 11 answers · asked by doorseeker 1

2006-09-01 08:20:15 · 13 answers · asked by doorseeker 1

2006-09-01 07:54:12 · 4 answers · asked by Commando Commandah 4

2006-09-01 07:52:01 · 5 answers · asked by Commando Commandah 4

My Birthday is August 2nd what's your.

2006-09-01 06:56:46 · 14 answers · asked by creamy8282 1

2006-09-01 06:54:48 · 5 answers · asked by Cristian F 1

Here is the link the Polish site where you can find two pictures with crosses obstructed by objects. How it is possible ?

http://www.paranormalne.forall.pl/forumVRP/viewtopic.php?t=241&sid=0f723bbc2fddff608c2b752e423e5e3c

2006-09-01 06:37:00 · 7 answers · asked by j.juszkiewicz 1

Lockheed-Martin just beat out space pioneers Northrup-Grumman and Boeing for all the new NASA aerospace launches. Lockheed-Martin builds military bombs, including all the upscale plus-million-dollar bombs, some of which aren't exactly dead-on accurate.

Do you feel comfortable in sending people up into space at the hands of jerks who are best known for making things that almost always blow up?

2006-09-01 05:57:37 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous