http://www.ufos-aliens.co.uk/cosmicapollo.html
This has to be the biggest cover-up in history considering there are still big majority people who still think we landed on it. Well before you answer at least read this page or even parts of it and tell me we landed on the Moon.
2006-09-15 12:27:48 · 16 answers · asked by Moon Man 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
Time to remove the tinfoil hat.
2006-09-15 12:29:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
braxton - you missed the Holohoax, the Big Jewish Lie about Nazi Gas Chambers. That one really is a hoax.
The moon landings were real.
The rumors about space aliens running around Air Force bases in general, and in particular at Wright-Patterson AFB (inside Hanger 18 and in the Foreign Technology Division) are hoaxes. I used to work at FTD, and I didn't see any aliens. There are, however, many jokes about stupid reporters looking for aliens.
The conspiracy theory regarding US government involvement in the WTC demolitions of 11 Sep 2001 is plausible. The allegations of treason are not hoaxes; they are well considered, based on the available evidence, and seem to be more credible than the government's "official version" of the 9-11 attack.
Santa Claus is a fable. The Tooth Fairy is a fable.
Jesus was probably real, but the stories about his divinity are certainly somewhat exaggerated.
The Earth isn't flat. The flat-earth society is attempting to perpetrate a hoax.
You have quite a mix of actual hoaxes interspersed with tenable theories. I am uncertain whether you mixed them deliberately, but I have come to recognize "mythological transfer" as an effective propaganda technique: lumping a fact or a plausible explanation alongside mention of a number of well-known hoaxes in order to associate the falseness of the items that are certainly false with the other items that aren't really known to be false.
2006-09-15 16:29:07 · answer #2 · answered by David S 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
How could NASA, NSA, CIA or anyone else have created such a nearly perfect cover-up when they have made a complete b***ocks of so many other much easier things, both before and since?
Why would the Russians NOT have cashed in by exposing it? They had a HUGE political motive to do so at the time if they could, and one H*** of a lot more technical resources to do it with than any of the current conspiracy nuts have - but they never called FOUL. If the Russkis believed it, then so do I.
2006-09-16 07:41:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That guy is pretty obviously miseducated.
Three simple things fix many of his problems.
NASA admittedly edited many of the photos, as the writer points out himself it was difficult for the astronauts to take the pictures, so NASA edited out some mistakes they made.
The astronauts were not in the Van Allen belt for very long and they had protection... the radiation they received was minimal and may cause long term effects but nothing crazy.
The moon DOES have an atmosphere. It is thin and not as protective as the Earths, but it's there, and it scatters light enough to illuminate shadowed areas and create halos. Don't know who told this guy it didn't have one... obvioiusly with some gravity you still have some atmosphere.
2006-09-15 17:14:11 · answer #4 · answered by iMi 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Okay, let's see...not only were all the lunar landings faked, but the moon itself is a NASA hoax, Area 51 is full of aliens, the government destroyed the WTC and bombed the Pentagon, Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy are real, and the Earth is flat. Have I missed any..?????
2006-09-15 15:51:07 · answer #5 · answered by Chug-a-Lug 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
This site answers everything on that site in great detail. I believe these explanations are far more convincing. It's way too long to summarize, but here's just one.
The reason the flag appears to wave is that, as can be clearly seen, the astronaut is twisting the pole.
http://www.redzero.demon.co.uk/moonhoax/
Another argument is that, for you to be right, NASA would have had to create fake moon rocks that would fool every geologist that looked at them. Boy, NASA is _really_ good (sarcastic).
2006-09-15 14:40:35 · answer #6 · answered by Bob 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Wouldnt it be just as easy for you to mess with this footage as you claim it was for them? I'm not saying you are wrong, or right. Truth is, I dont really know. And ya know what, I dont really care! It doesnt affect my life at all if the moon landing was a fake. We all figure that the government lies to us anyway. I can tell you have done a lot of work, and good job. But even with that seed of doubt planted in my mind, my day-to-day life is going to be exactly the same.
2006-09-15 13:00:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
What is this… Alien Autopsy?
Tell the Cheese Heads to give us our mirrors back. Dang Jackasses!
They probably think this is Tatoonine in Black and White
2006-09-15 15:51:10 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ummm, you should read your own citation. The author says near the front that he is not claiming we never went, but that some of the photos and footage have been doctored or faked.
2006-09-15 14:25:21 · answer #9 · answered by Ken H 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Put your crack pipe down and check into rehab. Reality is too precious a thing to spend your life escaping.
2006-09-15 17:34:52 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋