There's apparently this book called the Urantia Book. A lot of people claim it's revelatory and has proven many scientific things before they came to pass...One thing has me skeptical though:
Please read the following statement (by the way Ovronton is supposedly the name of our universe as the book describes it):
"In Orvonton it has never been possible naturally to assemble over one hundred orbital electrons in one atomic system. When one hundred and one have been artificially introduced into the orbital field, the result has always been the instantaneous disruption of the central proton with the wild dispersion of the electrons and other liberated energies."
Now I know that some "elements" above 100 are more stable than some of the elements below 100 (ex: radioactive elements below 100). But, I am wondering if perhaps I am misreading this? The book had this information composed in 1934...so I am not sure what the definition of an atomic system is/was in 1934...can someone help me?
2007-10-11
18:56:04
·
3 answers
·
asked by
Joe F
2
in
Physics